[Delphinium]

Jim is cracking down on false claims made by rudy supporters against conservative candidates.

I wouldn't mind them so much cause they are fun to fight with, but we should atleast be allowed to give it back as hard. And for the most part I have done that without being as much as warned.

Still don't believe Fierce Allegience did anything that bad, especially since it was to those much worse than he was.

Liars usually get found out, so I don't even care if they lie. It reveals who they really are.

[Luke21]

I think that we are free to be civil and disagree with these people. They rarely respond with anything but one sentence statements and diatribes and insults.

If that sounds familiar, try engaging a liberal sometime. You can give them ten pages of facts and get back a single sentence insult or stereotype for your trouble.

In my case, I’ve gone from just posting and leaving and not answering charges and insults to actually standing for verbal battle. My son loves to argue. I don’t. But I’m developing a real taste for it. Rudy Giuliani may be the best thing to hit the GOP in a long time, because the danger of his nomination is making us fight. If you don't believe it, read the posts from our leader. Now there's a man I can follow into battle.

[CharlesWayneCT]

I’ve made a proposal over in another pro-rudy thread.

The pro-rudy people be allowed to stay. They can post their articles. But they promise to post only one time. If the same article appears 5 different places, they only post it once, with the correct title.

If a blog discusses it, they link the blog into the existing thread. If they accidentally start another thread, we lock the thread and point it to the existing thread, unless they abuse this and then we summarily delete duplicates.

I think the pro-rudy people would be more tolerable if they didn’t post everything 3 or 4 times. There are at least 2 posts of the latest Deroy Murdock screed, for example.