My argument is with the "we must change hearts and minds" fallacy. The majority of hearts and minds are already closer to the pro-life position than the current abortion of demand culture imposed by Roe and Casey. There never was a pro-abortion majority and the "hearts and minds" argument is made by those brainwashed by the pro-abortion forces and media and too chicken poop to take a position that they wrongly perceive as unpopular on the most important moral issue of the last half century.
I would agree. And after Roe is overturned I think laws restricting abortion to those circumstances would easily pass in nearly all states.
To pass a law banning abortion even in the case of rape or incest (which is what I think most pro-lifers want) would be a lot tougher, and yes, hearts and minds do come into play in that case.