Look, I hate to get all technical on you, but there's no way I said that every Rudy supporter is being banned. LOL. It's amusing for you to write it that way, of course, but you know it's not true.
What did quidnick (sp?) do to get banned? Nothing that I can see. What did MiaT do to get banned and called an abortionist troll?
No idea. But, while we are on the subject, ca someone please explain how to read her posts? For many years now everyone has talked about how great her posts are. Yet, I can't figure them out. It seems to be pages and pages of disjointed ramblings and graphics. I can't even ever figure out what the posts are about, or how they relate to whatever the headline is.
“What did quidnick (sp?) do to get banned?”
Go back and look, post 50 I believe.
Fool forgot who he was talking to.
And got the God-Zot.
(And yes, your spelling was incorrect.)
—>
“So you prefer Hillary, then?” -quidnunc (Since 1998-09-15)
...”Up yours asswipe.” -Jim Robinson
...”This account has been banned or suspended.”
<—
quidnick, according to Jim Robinson, attacked the founding fathers to try by tearing them down to make Rudy look better. It rubbed Jim the wrong way.
Mia T. posted a vanity thread where she claimed that if we don’t vote for Rudy, the blood of all the dead babies would be on our hands. Then she said Fred was a globalist DC politician who couldn’t be trusted. It turned out she had posted two other vanity-style threads this month attacking Fred. In one she said denounced his lack of experience while completely ignoring his senate career, and in the other she claimed he was deceiving us and running just to help McCain. She linked both of those into her “what is pro-life” thread, hijacking and spamming her own thread.
And she made two posts that were so bad she deleted them.
That is what got her banned.
But you are correct, you did not say that “every” person was being banned, and I apologize for the hyperbole. Without looking back, I’ll just say that the impression you left with me in the preponderance of your posts was that you think pro-rudy posters are being unfairly targetted for banning for no good reason, that you are in fear of being banned, and that there are an unspecified but supposedly large number of freepers who are afraid to even admit to being rudy supporters for fear of being banned.
If that is not what you meant to convey tonight, I am sorry I got the wrong impression, and you can decide for yourself tomorrow whether you are comfortable with giving me that impression.