Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran's Air Defense Can Repel U.S. Air Strikes - Russian Brass
RIA Novosti ^ | April 5, 2007

Posted on 04/05/2007 10:57:37 AM PDT by Fennie

MOSCOW - Iran has air defense systems capable of repelling possible United States air strikes, a high-ranking Russian military official said Thursday. "In line with my assessment, Iran's air defense system is strong enough," Colonel General Yury Solovyov, commander of the Air Defense Forces Special Command, said. "Currently Iran has our Russian air defense missile systems, which are capable of tackling U.S. combat aircraft. Iran also has French and other countries defense systems...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airdefense; iran; russia; unitedstates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: CholeraJoe
We have some 50-year-old Buffs with brand new equipment that will do just fine against that Russian cr*p.

I hope so, but from my own experience as a B-52 Electronic Warfare officer the 'new' equipment tended to be pretty marginal stuff, just good enough to say we had new equipment. The Air Force thinks in terms of 'attack' and loathes spending real money on defense.

Of course, that was nearly thirty years ago.

41 posted on 04/05/2007 11:39:46 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Someone correct me if Im wrong, but don’t we have the gravity bombs that can be released miles and miles away and still hit their targets?

And wouldnt this be an excellent time to try out our supposedly conventional ICBMs that I heard we had?


42 posted on 04/05/2007 11:42:28 AM PDT by Armedanddangerous (Master of Sinanju (emeritus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
Everybody has missed the truth spoken here in this comment. Of course, Iran can repel any possible airstrikes, they are masters of media in the area of propaganda.

Now if we they were talking about an ACTUAL airstrikes the comment would be something different alltogether.
43 posted on 04/05/2007 11:43:57 AM PDT by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Sounds like a salesman talking. Off-the-record, General, tell me what you really think? Do you want to stand near an Iranian Nuke facility after the B2’s leave Whitman AFB?


44 posted on 04/05/2007 11:44:14 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia
How good is the Russian system at detecting stealth aircraft?

Depending on what they have, possibly better than many think. People forget the F-117 that was tracked and shot down in Bosnia. The Russians (and Chinese, and French) have not been idle since then.

45 posted on 04/05/2007 11:44:31 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
Well that’s fine and nice but these cruise missiles are for you......
46 posted on 04/05/2007 11:45:18 AM PDT by Wraith (To have peace prepare for War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee Heggy123

DR. Strangelove. Great flick.


47 posted on 04/05/2007 11:46:10 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

We should send a brave couple of souls to fly over one of their air defense units at about 100 feet and pop some flares when they are right on top of them.


48 posted on 04/05/2007 11:48:05 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
"The first Raptors in will take care of them, if they weren’t destroyed on the ground by the Tomahawks and the Spirits."

We won't need to hit those planes directly. We will just destroy the runways first. That will pin those planes down their revetments for future destruction.

49 posted on 04/05/2007 11:49:48 AM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
They'll never see it coming...


served U.S.N. 78-82...


Proudly working on U.S. Military defense projects periodically from 86 to 06...


I live in Nevada and not one casino would carry odds against U.S.A.(even at a thousand to one)!


I hope Iranian government officials like heat...


satan keeps a special spot for scum like you.
50 posted on 04/05/2007 11:50:28 AM PDT by Issaquahking (Duncan Hunter for president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Did they not say the same thing about serbia?


51 posted on 04/05/2007 11:52:54 AM PDT by N3WBI3 ("Help me out here guys: What do you do with someone who wont put up or shut up?" - N3WBI3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia
How good is the Russian system at detecting stealth aircraft?

Detecting is only Step 1. You have to be able to Track, before you can FIRE. Tracking is the hard part, and it almost never gets mentioned.

Networked air defense systems can detect & may be able to track stealth aircraft. But as Iraq found out, the first cruise missile salvo usually takes the network offline. Stand-alone radars get picked off after that.

52 posted on 04/05/2007 11:53:02 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

The F-117 has a big RCS compared to a B-2. Also, the F-117 that was shot down was flying a very restricted and repetitively traveled ingress-egress route. AND as far as I know, there was no ECM/jamming assisting their flight.

The F-117 is NOT invisible — it is relatively low observable. Put enough RF of the right frequency out there and your targeting system can find it. The B-2 OTOH is a fast-moving shadow of a bird to a SAM radar.


53 posted on 04/05/2007 11:53:30 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

54 posted on 04/05/2007 11:54:29 AM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff2no

But they will hear it ... 2.3 seconds after it passes by !


55 posted on 04/05/2007 11:55:21 AM PDT by dartuser ("If you torture the data long enough, it will confess, even to crimes it did not commit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GunnyHartman
Captioned:
Hey Russky, thanks for the detailed plans on how the Iranian air defense system works!
56 posted on 04/05/2007 11:56:24 AM PDT by Stayfree (***************************************Fred D. Thompson for President.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: peekingfromabox

They got right on the outsourcing bandwagon. They outsourced some of their most belligerant, mass destructive elements to so called “rogue” nations. They outsourced cheap, mass produced tactical and IRBM oriented nuclear production to the PRC. And they resourced terrorism from Arab Pan Nationalsts to the current terror cabal, in its variety of flavors.


57 posted on 04/05/2007 12:13:29 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rjp2005
"I think there is some truth to this. The Favorit systems are no joke and will be able to shoot down some cruise missiles. The TOR-M1s are lesser but higher in quantity. We will incur some losses I think, but we can still hurt them more."

And there is a big problem. If our sole aim was to take out their nuclear reactor than an onslaught of cruise missiles might do the trick.

If we launch a bunch of aircraft against them then we would inevitably lose some of them. In this very political war any captured American Pilots would be put on parade. The media would act like they were the ONLY U.S. plane sent into the area and "the powerful and superior forces of Islam blew them out of the sky!"

One of the major tools of war is propaganda. The left all but owns the propaganda machine and in their world victories by the United States are never anything to celebrate, rather victory is to be demonized and mocked.

58 posted on 04/05/2007 12:14:55 PM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

They cannot repell the Tomahawk cruise missle... flies too low and below their antiquated Russian radar systems.


59 posted on 04/05/2007 12:18:12 PM PDT by bedolido (I can forgive you for killing my sons, but I cannot forgive you for forcing me to kill your sons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Techno-moslims operating equipment built by the Russians. Now there is a no-win situation of there ever was one.


60 posted on 04/05/2007 12:21:33 PM PDT by newcthem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson