Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill would block credit cards for illegals
Commercial Appeal ^ | 03.07.07 | Bartholomew Sullivan

Posted on 03/07/2007 10:50:08 AM PST by Dr. Marten

Bill would block credit cards for illegals
 

Blackburn seeks to close loophole in U.S. banking

 
WASHINGTON -- U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., introduced legislation Monday that would prevent illegal immigrants from receiving credit cards from American financial institutions.

The Photo Identification Security Act would require banks to use what Blackburn calls "secure forms of identification" to obtain credit. In a statement put out by her office, she says that Bank of America "has come under fire in response to reports that it allows illegal immigrants access to credit cards without proper documentation."

Advertisement
Bank of America spokesmen maintain that they follow the letter of the law in permitting customers to use the forms of identification permissible under the U.S.A. Patriot Act. That includes matricula consular cards issued by the Mexican government.

"The American people deserve to know that the integrity and security of our financial institutions will remain intact," Blackburn said in a statement Monday. "This bill closes a critical loophole that banking institutions have used to circumvent the letter of the law they have used to target illegal aliens as a new source of revenue. It says to banks and illegal immigrants alike, 'You can't get a Visa, without a visa.'"

Bank of America issues the secured, or collateralized, credit cards only after a customer has established a deposit account, and to get a deposit account, the company requires a Social Security number, proof of U.S. government federal taxpayer status, or other documents listed as identification by the Patriot Act.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; creditcaeds; creditcards; illegals; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Dr. Marten
U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., introduced legislation Monday that would prevent illegal immigrants from receiving credit cards from American financial institutions

Hmmmm. If memory serves correctly, it is illegal for illegal immigrants to be in this country and we all know how effective the enforcement of that law has been.

Sounds like another law to be placed on the books with no enforement. Or, just possibly, the financial institutions will be prosecuted and the illegals will still run around free.

But, Hey, what the hell do I know?

21 posted on 03/07/2007 11:09:19 AM PST by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten

A rising star...

22 posted on 03/07/2007 11:10:24 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

you go girl!


23 posted on 03/07/2007 11:11:09 AM PST by Jen from Tn.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten

I hate to say I'm for more government regulation, but I have a tough time arguing against this one.


24 posted on 03/07/2007 11:11:57 AM PST by ukie55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., introduced legislation Monday that would prevent illegal immigrants from receiving credit cards from American financial institutions.

Gee, who would ever have thought that giving illegals more access to our system is a bad thing. These banks should be shut down.

25 posted on 03/07/2007 11:12:05 AM PST by jetson (II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten

You are correct, it seems boycotts really only work in socialist type societies


26 posted on 03/07/2007 11:12:24 AM PST by Domicile of Doom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner

Is it me or does she look like Sarah Chalke(Elliot Reid in Scrubs)? Not thread related but thought I would comment.


27 posted on 03/07/2007 11:17:15 AM PST by Post-Neolithic (Money only makes Communists rich Communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten

Oh? And you have called and canceled all your BOA credit cards? When I did (I had 3) by the the second one things were getting interesting...


28 posted on 03/07/2007 11:17:18 AM PST by Colorado Mike (Lord, help me be the Conservative my enemies think I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ukie55
I hate to say I'm for more government regulation, but I have a tough time arguing against this one.

Ditto. B of A should change their name to Bank of Amerexico.

29 posted on 03/07/2007 11:18:53 AM PST by OB1kNOb (After 20+ LONG years, a REAL conservative I can support 4 President - DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
Here's the Text of H.R. 1314:
 
Photo Identification Security Act (Introduced in House)

HR 1314 IH

110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 1314

To provide that only certain forms of identification of individuals may be accepted by the Federal Government and by financial institutions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 5, 2007

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, and Mr. ROYCE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned


A BILL

To provide that only certain forms of identification of individuals may be accepted by the Federal Government and by financial institutions.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2. FORMS OF ACCEPTABLE IDENTIFICATION FOR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURPOSES.

SEC. 3. FORMS OF ACCEPTABLE IDENTIFICATION FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.


30 posted on 03/07/2007 11:21:11 AM PST by Dr. Marten (Bush Immigration Policy: No Illegal Alien Left Behind! (http://thehorsesmouth.blog-city.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Post-Neolithic
..not familiar with that show

I've been watching Marsha in Congress for awhile--sounds like one tough lady...

31 posted on 03/07/2007 11:23:09 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten
Normally, I would agree. But since it's illegal to shoot illegals, I don't really see any other alternative because boycotts are a waste of time.

What ever problems exist in any industry, government involvement always makes it worse, not better.

If the government gets involved in who may and may not have credit, you can be guaranteed that it will become a monster entirely detached from its original purpose, probably to guarantee credit for illegals and restrict it for citizens.

...for our own good.

Government "protection" of forests has resulted in increased disease and fire damage of "protected" trees.

Government "management" of "public" lands has resulted in nothing but higher taxes and more restricted access to the public.

What ever your good intentions, giving the government more power over the decisions of others is always a Bad Idea.

32 posted on 03/07/2007 11:25:10 AM PST by TChris (The Democrat Party: A sewer into which is emptied treason, inhumanity and barbarism - O. Morton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten

I am proud to say Marsha is my rep.

Marsha is a bulldog, and will go far towards representing real consevatism.


33 posted on 03/07/2007 11:25:54 AM PST by Grammy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grammy

or conservatism


34 posted on 03/07/2007 11:26:37 AM PST by Grammy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Everyone! Repeat after me: More government regulation is not the answer!

This is already regulated. The bill only changes the already extant regulation by changing the list of what ID is acceptable.

Are you arguing that once a regulation exists it should never be changed even though it is clear it is not working the way it was designed to?

35 posted on 03/07/2007 11:27:55 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ukie55

Just enforce the laws already on the books.


36 posted on 03/07/2007 11:28:57 AM PST by wordsofearnest (Zachary Taylor s/h finished the job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten

Interestingly, there's a bill pending that would repeal title II of the Real ID Act...


37 posted on 03/07/2007 11:29:24 AM PST by voltaires_zit (Government is the problem, not the answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Marten

Start in the right direction. Does anyone know the status of the bill that prevents babies of illegals born in the US automatic citizenship? Passage of that bill would be another step on the right path.


38 posted on 03/07/2007 11:31:27 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris
When regulation involves upholding established laws (immigration, in this case), I don't have a problem with it.
Are you suggesting that it would be ok for financial institutions to establish special credit/banking programs for felons or fugitives? I doubt it.
39 posted on 03/07/2007 11:32:55 AM PST by batter (aka "soccer8" ~ "Always take the offensive...Never Dig in." - Gen Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
This is already regulated. The bill only changes the already extant regulation by changing the list of what ID is acceptable.

I was unaware of that.

But my comment still stands. :-)

Are you arguing that once a regulation exists it should never be changed even though it is clear it is not working the way it was designed to?

I'd argue that once a regulation exists, its continued existence should require regular review and justification. Unfortunately, govt. regulations are eternal and immutable. Most of them are unnecessary and many are counterproductive.

40 posted on 03/07/2007 11:34:42 AM PST by TChris (The Democrat Party: A sewer into which is emptied treason, inhumanity and barbarism - O. Morton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson