Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scotts Valley parents asked to pay $36.13 if their kid skips school
Mercury News ^ | Tue, Feb. 13, 2007email thisprint this | Matt King

Posted on 02/14/2007 5:27:56 AM PST by wintertime

SCOTTS VALLEY - Parents whose kids take a day off from school will be asked to open their wallets. That will be $36.13, please.

Desperate to hold on to every penny of state funding, Scotts Valley Unified School District leaders are asking parents to make a donation to the district for the amount it loses every time a student is absent for a reason other than illness.

They say such absences cost the district $223,500 last school year.

``When parents keep their kids out of school, it's difficult for the child,'' Superintendent Susan Silver said. ``But it's also a cost to the district, and when we're in declining enrollment, every single bit of money is important to us.''

State funding for schools is based in large part on a formula called ``average daily attendance.'' Districts aren't paid for how many students are enrolled in their schools, but how many kids show up for classes. So, more absences means less money.

Scotts Valley Unified has 2,722 students enrolled this year, down from a high of 2,846 two years ago. Based on enrollment, the district is eligible to receive more than $14.9 million in state aid, or about 80 percent of its operating budget.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: attendance; california; homeschool; publikskools; school; schoolattendance; schoolfunds; scottsvalley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-353 next last
To: wintertime
I'm all for this, as long as I get a refund for every day my kid says he learned nothing at school that day.
41 posted on 02/14/2007 6:54:48 AM PST by Night Hides Not (Chuck Hagel is the Republican Joe Biden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0
Should be $622,080 over the course of 12 years for the brood if you give the State kindergarten as a freebie.

Wow! And that's not even counting all the special-ed money we could get for crazy Pat. (I mean, Tim. Today his name is Tim, and he says he's black.)

42 posted on 02/14/2007 6:55:23 AM PST by Tax-chick (Every "choice" has a direct object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SoftballMominVA
It is the working class, the immigrants, and the welfare recipients that benefit from the taxes that the upper class, middle class and businesses pay.

Is this a great country or what? (what's left of it.) Those that pay into the "system" get very little and those that don't pay into the "system" get everything.

43 posted on 02/14/2007 6:56:54 AM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

You summed it up quite nicely, my friend


44 posted on 02/14/2007 6:58:22 AM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Isn't it nice to see that children are the property of the local public school system?


45 posted on 02/14/2007 6:58:57 AM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Government schools are nothing more than ADMC&RF

While I absolutely dispise public schools, I disagree with this statement.. I pay more to the local school district every year in property taxes than I pay for tuition for my son to go to a private school, and my house is assessed at 150k, so hardly am I milking anything. Not only am I fully funding my own childs education, I'm paying more than that to the public schools, who will spend 2 to 3 times that much per child and graduate a less educated adult at the end.

I'm paying enough in property taxes to my school district to send some strangers kid to the same private school I pay for my child to go to and then some, and that's still not enough for 1 child in the public school system.

46 posted on 02/14/2007 7:06:37 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

"Today his name is Tim, and he says he's black."

He's just got that Mardi Gras vibe going. He'll be fine next week.


47 posted on 02/14/2007 7:06:42 AM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (A Muslim soldier can never be loyal to a non-Muslim commander.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

It's a 1/2 school day in Guilford today. I let my son stay home, so I guess they'll send me bill for only $18.


48 posted on 02/14/2007 7:09:27 AM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (A Muslim soldier can never be loyal to a non-Muslim commander.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
every single bit of money is important to us.''

The greed of these people is unbelievable.

49 posted on 02/14/2007 7:23:25 AM PST by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0
He's just got that Mardi Gras vibe going.

Good point. I'll have to find some reggae on the satellite radio!

50 posted on 02/14/2007 7:25:31 AM PST by Tax-chick (Every "choice" has a direct object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

You could make money by letting people pinch those sweet little cheeks of Vlad's! Course, we might need defense from the penguin trolls, but hey, no reward without risk?


51 posted on 02/14/2007 7:41:13 AM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
I don't understand how your analogy applies.

You reserved my restaurant for a WHOLE YEAR.

You paid for that privilege for a WHOLE YEAR.

I bought food and staff to serve you for a WHOLE YEAR.

You don't show up on Tuesday, and I'm supposed to go after you for something EXTRA?

Sorry, but that boat just doesn't float.

52 posted on 02/14/2007 7:44:51 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Public schools are tax funded institutions which means the middle class (as you call them) have already paid for their schooling as well as fire, safety, health and human services; and now you want to assess them a daily rate to incarcerate their children in these dens of inequity under penalty of truancy?

The only solution to the dilemma of public schools and their failure is dissolution.


53 posted on 02/14/2007 7:47:23 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logophile
Good analogy, except for one thing. You have already paid for the restaurant meal you did not eat. In fact, you pay for the restaurant even if you never eat there. True, you paid to the restaurant's corporate headquarters, which may or may not decide to send the money to the local restaurant. It seems to me that if the restaurant management has a complaint, it is with corporate management.

That would be true if "you" were the only tax payer in the school district but that is not the case.

The taxes that "you" pay in school taxes in one year do NOT begin to pay the cost of educating one student per year. That cost is subsidized by all the other taxpayers in the school district that have paid to staff the school at a certain level.

When you tax me to fund the local school at a certain level to educate your child and, after my money has been spent to staff the school at a certain level, your child is a "No Show", you have paid for only a small fraction of the wasted tax money and the rest of us taxpayers have had to pick up the rest of the bill.

It is like going to a restaurant with five friends with an agreement that the bill will be shared equally, ordering the most expensive item by far on the menu and then not eating a bite out of it. When your friends complain, you say that it is your food and that you have "paid for it".

54 posted on 02/14/2007 7:51:53 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
The taxes that "you" pay in school taxes in one year do NOT begin to pay the cost of educating one student per year.

Yes....but.... my family will pay taxes for 50 working years, so while the 8k I pay a year in state, local, and personal property taxes does not pay for one years worth of school, it certanily pays for my 2 kids, plus several others over my working lifetime.

55 posted on 02/14/2007 7:53:59 AM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
I don't understand how your analogy applies. You reserved my restaurant for a WHOLE YEAR. You paid for that privilege for a WHOLE YEAR. I bought food and staff to serve you for a WHOLE YEAR. You don't show up on Tuesday, and I'm supposed to go after you for something EXTRA? Sorry, but that boat just doesn't float.

"You" reserved the restaurant for the whole year.

"We", the rest of the school district taxpayers, paid most of the tab.

See Post 54.

We are paying for food that you are leaving on the table.

56 posted on 02/14/2007 8:00:13 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SoftballMominVA

LOL!


57 posted on 02/14/2007 8:04:22 AM PST by Tax-chick (Every "choice" has a direct object.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
The taxes that "you" pay in school taxes in one year do NOT begin to pay the cost of educating one student per year.

True.

If I only paid taxes for 12 years, then you might have a point.

But I've paid school taxes for 35 years, and have YET to use them for any children, unless you want me to count myself, (in which case, who did my Dad's taxes pay for?)

And it sound like the OP and you want me to pay EVEN MORE, because I homeschool my son.

58 posted on 02/14/2007 8:09:37 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Schools are big on attendance these days and I support that with no problem. In fact, if there is a student with a high absence rate schools are now taking parents to court for truancy.

But to fine parents because a child skips school is wrong.


59 posted on 02/14/2007 8:12:27 AM PST by Mfkmmof4 (St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
We are paying for food that you are leaving on the table.

Horse puckey.

What exactly is this "food" that the alleged "educators" are "leaving on the table" and is therefore ruined, because Johnny skipped class?

I could see it if they reserved a trip to the museum and got tickets for all the kids, and then Johnny didn't show up, after they got the tickets.

But in everyday stuff, I don't see it.

60 posted on 02/14/2007 8:14:42 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-353 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson