Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kucinich to reintroduce Fairness Doctrine Censorship
Fox News | 1/30/07

Posted on 01/30/2007 6:41:41 PM PST by pabianice

Congressman Dennis Kucinich is now on Fox. He is reintroducing the "Fairness Doctrine" to be passed into law. He does not like conservative radio and blogs and is intent upon ending them by making broadcasters air "opposing opinions" for each "conservative program." He is ripping Hannity for "not letting him talk" even as he is interviewed. I suspect the House will pass this. Don't know about the Senate.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fairnessdoctrine; kucinich; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: pabianice

For his second act he will introduce book burning...


61 posted on 01/30/2007 9:41:56 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life ;o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

His bill is DOA.


62 posted on 01/30/2007 9:56:32 PM PST by freespirited (Honk for disbarment of Mike Nifong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fkabuckeyesrule

buckeye, I just watched it again. I agree. Colmes (shocking me) made sense.

I can't believe Ohio voters elected this nutcase. He is downright spooky!

He's kind of like what I picture Dingy Harry's lil bro to look like.


63 posted on 01/30/2007 10:01:14 PM PST by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Kook-cinich: "We have to stop these crazy conservatives from being heard..er, I mean, uh we have to have fairness in broadcasting. Which means I hope eventually we'll be able to ban conservatives from the airwaves. Er, I mean hopefully we'll have all voices heard." (stuffs Lenin's Book of Commie Wisdom in pocket and leaves the podium)


64 posted on 01/31/2007 3:05:15 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush








65 posted on 01/31/2007 3:40:09 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mware
I got to hand it to Colmes this one time.

Colmes may be liberal but he knows which side his bread is buttered on.

I like Colmes, though. He seems to be a genuine person.

66 posted on 01/31/2007 4:27:16 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pennboricua

The Government will just state that ABCCBSNBC etc is not liberal or slanted and taking a side...isn't that what they are doing right now?


67 posted on 01/31/2007 5:44:43 AM PST by Getsmart64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Shortstop7
"I can't believe Ohio voters elected this nutcase."

I really get tired of reading this. WE HAVE NO CHOICE in this congressional district,it's 70% democratic.
We had a decent candidate run against him and he lost. He received NO help from the RNC because our district is considered a LOSS. I'm sure no one would like it if they had no representation in the House of Representatives.
68 posted on 01/31/2007 6:22:29 AM PST by Country Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Getsmart64

I believe we have what is called a Supreme Court, currently and for the coming future conservative leaning, we have what is called Due Process rights which does not allow for selective prosecution, how a liberal station would be recused from following that doctrine I fail to see.


69 posted on 01/31/2007 8:14:18 AM PST by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: pennboricua
Are you saying that someone will take the notion that the MSM leans left all the way to the SC? Are you saying that someone will take a newspaper all the way to the SC to show that they are mis-leading or stating down right lies about current issues when a TV station is using their articles as a basis for it's bias????..That's crazy....
70 posted on 01/31/2007 9:43:22 AM PST by Getsmart64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

OK OK enough with the pics


71 posted on 01/31/2007 9:44:51 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Forgot your tagline? Click here to have it resent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

The TV news companies should be highly disconcerted by this. They will have to interrupt Couric every five minutes for five minutes of Savage or Rush.


72 posted on 01/31/2007 9:46:04 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Y'know, even if this ever passed both houses with veto proof majoritites, it wouldn't be the end of the hosts that we know. Satellite radio would explode with more hosts and the internet would still broadcast talk radio. The libs can fantasize about media they adored 15 years ago and beyon, but the toothpaste is already out of the tube on this one and people know the difference now.


73 posted on 01/31/2007 9:57:34 AM PST by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Getsmart64

See the way I remember this doctrine working when it was in effect was that even editorials given by management of tv stations they had to grant time for oppossing views, I remember that being the case, now any station bringing on a Liberal member of congress has to bring in a Conservative viewpoint.
Nowadays with so many different views from Liberterians, Independents et al this Doctrine will face immediate Due Process suits from many avenues, I do not see this as any great challenge.


74 posted on 01/31/2007 1:49:16 PM PST by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: pabianice

Has Bush hinted that he would sign this?


76 posted on 01/31/2007 1:53:09 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
While I believe that this "fairness doctrine" is little more than grandstanding by the democrats,and a really exceptionally stupid idea,

I have seen it described as "censoring" or "silencing" right-wing broadcasters.

From what I understand, it would simply require that if a station plays limbaugh for 3 hours, they would need to play some opposing viewpoint for 3 hours.......

so no one is actually "silenced" - or am I misinformed?
77 posted on 01/31/2007 1:55:47 PM PST by WhiteGuy (GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Surely the Supreme Court would have to awaken from its First Amendment stupor and declare this vile bill unconstitutional???
78 posted on 01/31/2007 1:58:00 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

He could never be elected, of course, but if he were this is a sign he would be the USA's version of Hugo Chavez.


79 posted on 01/31/2007 2:08:55 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy

No, but there is only so much airtime and there is a lot more conservatives on the radio than liberals. The libs make it up in Journalism..... which is failing almost as rapidly as errrrrr America.


80 posted on 01/31/2007 2:10:49 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson