To: Alter Kaker
Well if they didn't change a great deal this could be considered a shot in the arm for 'intelligent design' for one.
4 posted on
12/18/2006 3:47:59 PM PST by
ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
(To those who believe the world was safer with Saddam, get treatment for that!)
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Well if they didn't change a great deal this could be considered a shot in the arm for 'intelligent design' for one.No it wouldn't. Nothing in evolutionary theory says that an organism that has stumbled upon a successful formula has to change -- in fact it says the opposite. There will always be some genetic changes over time, but there's absolutely no need for dramatic change if the formula works.
7 posted on
12/18/2006 3:51:21 PM PST by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Well if they didn't change a great deal this could be considered a shot in the arm for 'intelligent design' for one.
*ahem*
16 posted on
12/18/2006 4:19:01 PM PST by
Wormwood
(I'm with you in Rockland)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson