[andy58-in-nh]

To be honest with you, I don't think the Republicans could have saved their majority under any circumstances this year, even if a change of leadership had been effected far earlier. The problem is not just leadership at the top, but throughout the ranks.

It seems almost inevitable that after being in power for a period of time, political parties lose their way. After a burst of initiative and activity, followed by implementation of some or many of their goals - their enthusiasm wanes. They lose their focus as the original agenda takes a backseat to the imperatives of governance. And then, as time goes by, the object of governance is no longer the pursuit of coherent policy, but the maintenance of power.

Don't feel badly, and certainly don't give up. It happens to most people in most parties. The Republicans may well need to fall further before they are ready to pick their sorry behinds off the ground, shake off the dust and get back to the blackboard to relearn all they forgot while playing the game.

One thing that will help them do so earlier would be the emergence of a new national leader - a person of principle, wisdom, vision, honor, courage and great good humor. One or more are out there. We need to find them - or wait until they find themselves.

[saveliberty]

See?

By your own post, you illustrate that individuals make a difference. I am glad that you are trying to encourage people to be honest and not discouraged. I just see the opportunities for change differently. I understand that you are trying to set expectations, but why set a timetable that becomes a self fulfilling prophesy when there are always opportunities? Most are small, some are big. I'm ready to roll up my sleeves and do what it takes. And it will take as long as it needs. But we don't have to fit a historical pattern. Information flows differently now.