i bet someone gave them some 'leaked' paper saying that we knew there was NO WMD BEFORE we went in...there is no way on esrth the times would run a story that backed Bush in any way, shape or form!
well, the NYT source does sound awfully giddy about it...maybe he thinks that the Times may have sunk the GOP ship...
I don't know though...If Drudge quoted his source correctly, it would seem to me like the story is about Iraq's research of Nuclear bombs...if there was no research going on, or if it was about BushLied™, then wouldn't you think that the headline might read differently?
Its gonna be a restless night...