To: letsgonova19087
I will be a contrarian and suggest that just maybe, before the elections, the NYT is changing it's stripes and this will be a support piece for the Bush Admin.
It will rip the dems for not being staunch defenders and supporters of the WOT.
Then, there will be a lot of phone solicitations offering discount subscriptions to the NYTs.
58 posted on
11/02/2006 5:38:16 PM PST by
Prost1
(Fair and Unbiased as always!)
To: Prost1
This means that the attempt by Wolf Blitzer today to return to Mark Foley (interviewing Reynolds) didn't cut it.
To: Prost1
I'm thinking its a possibility. Didn't I just see that their circulation numbers for NYTimes and Boston Globe fell again? Maybe this is the start of a campaign to try to bring some moderate-to-conservatives into their camp by cozying up to them before an election. Or, just as likely, they have a big story that their "inner reporter" conscience is just itching to tell
To: Prost1
I want some of whatever you're smoking.
68 posted on
11/02/2006 5:44:56 PM PST by
SuzyQue
(Remember to think.)
To: Prost1
I will be a contrarian and suggest that just maybe, before the elections, the NYT is changing it's stripes and this will be a support piece for the Bush Admin I dunno ... This paper pimped for Stalin.
107 posted on
11/02/2006 6:17:42 PM PST by
Mr. Buzzcut
(metal god ... visit The Ponderosa .... www.vandelay.com ... DEATH BEFORE DHIMMITUDE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson