http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjIzYTg5ZjdmYzIyOWFkZGU3NzE4MGIzMzViMjAyMjY=
POINT OF NO RETURN IN THE IRAN NUCLEAR CRISIS...? [Mario Loyola] ..."In my piece in the current (August 28) print edition of National Review, I described precisely this eventuality as a point of no return, and argued that the United States should invoke preemption if this ever happened..."
It's a short excerpt from a subs article- he says IF Iran blocked inspectors, then we should bomb now, since we would be completely in the dark. We would have to bomb now, because the threat could be imminent before we knew it... THAT was Iran's answer, IMO - blocking inspectors. The formal reply was probably more of the same. This is a great point, and this is different from Saddam. 10-12 years is too long to fiddle with the UN. If we go that same route again, we are basically blessing Iran's nuke ambitions.
I would like to know something: when did we decide to allow the UN to dictate our national security? Why is this acceptable? All of this UN stupidity is maddening. They will not give up nukes. How many times will Iran have to say it before we believe it?