Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tancred

While I agree with you there is something suspicion going on here, I have to say that any businessman that refuses a cash sale, regardless of the product, should not be in business.


50 posted on 08/20/2006 10:10:26 PM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
I have to say that any businessman that refuses a cash sale, regardless of the product, should not be in business.

So Ahmed, Abdul and Vaheed offer you a garbage bag full of cash for an agricultural helicopter that disperses pesticides; you sell no questions asked?

You'll be in the Fortune 500 in no time at all...

60 posted on 08/20/2006 10:22:09 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz

It is not enough for there to be suspicion of illegal activity for a forfeiture. It must be traceable to an offense that allows forfeiture, such as drug crimes.

I think there were probably some immigration issues going on here, accounting for being able to amass funds in cash rather than accounts. And an immigration violation does not give rise to forfeiture.


310 posted on 08/24/2006 11:05:11 AM PDT by Julliardsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson