Replies

Because there is plenty of evidence that the building was heavily damaged and fell due to that damage and the fire.

As for your idea that the building was wired for demolition during construction, I find that idea bizarre and fanciful. Has that ever been done before?
Does that mean just the wiring? I assume they wouldn't put the explosives in their while the place was being built!

Do you have any evidence to back up your opinions?

I have presented documented testimony from a firefighter that was there and analysis by a demolition expert.

What do you have to back up your ideas?

here's a photo of WTC7 on fire with the aforementioned gaping hole.

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/536/239/1600/wtc7_2.jpg

source
http://911yj.blogspot.com/2006/08/wtc-7-photo-for-visually-impaired.html

"Because there is plenty of evidence that the building was heavily damaged and fell due to that damage and the fire. "

Not disputing the damage and fire. Not disputing that the building fell because of it. Just presenting a possibility that the building may have came down with a little help if they were sure it was going to come down anyway. Better controlled than not controlled.

. "As for your idea that the building was wired for demolition during construction, I find that idea bizarre and fanciful. Has that ever been done before? Does that mean just the wiring? I assume they wouldn't put the explosives in their while the place was being built!

Not my idea. Just repeating what I read.

Do you have any evidence to back up your opinions?

Not my opinions. Just a re-statement of the opinions of others. It is not a critical issue with me. I though it was of interest to mention the possibility of demolition, and at a critical moment, someone may have said, 'bring it down.' No big deal. The building was going to have to be re-built anyway. The building was vacated and a perimeter was established. Everyone had at least an hour to clear the area. All three networks had cameras ready. Perhaps they can confirm that they were notified what time the building was coming down.

If it was demolition-assisted, it may have been for safety reasons and an agreed-upon insurance settelement..

If I ever bump into the report again, I'll send you the url.