Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry; longshadow

By the way, they accounted for dust by observing at multiple wavelengths. Dust usually preferentially obscures redder wavelengths, so they can account for the dust by observing 7 or 8 filters and modelling for the dust from the expected spectrum (of an O9 star in this case).


108 posted on 08/03/2006 5:01:23 PM PDT by ThinkPlease (Fortune Favors the Bold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: ThinkPlease
By the way, they accounted for dust by observing at multiple wavelengths.

Ahhhhhhh!

Thanks....

114 posted on 08/03/2006 6:02:11 PM PDT by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: ThinkPlease; longshadow
By the way, they accounted for dust by observing at multiple wavelengths

Thanks for the info. I assumed that they dealt with the issue, because even though that problem didn't occur to me, nor did I know how to handle it, I have confidence that researchers at that level would be unlikely to overlook what -- to them -- would be an obvious source of error.

115 posted on 08/03/2006 6:15:00 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Everything is blasphemy to someone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson