Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lucky Dog

"First, unless they are doing it public, the military has no way of knowing." Then lets just keep the gay sex a secret and everything is hunky dory.


189 posted on 07/27/2006 3:07:22 PM PDT by Mazda3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: Mazda3Fan
Then lets just keep the gay sex a secret and everything is hunky dory.

That is, I believe, known as "staying in the closet." Unfortunately, from a security risk perspective, queers are neither content to confine themselves to a single, or even a few partners, nor able to be discreet about their activities. Consequently, these people are still subject to blackmail.

Furthermore, as a generality, unlike the example you cited earlier with a spouse, few queers have any loyalty to the partner in the activity. If such were the case, then there would be very little problem with queers being "outed," would there?

Finally, there is still the problem of the queer disease risk. Blood borne pathogens are a very real threat in a battlefield environment. There is enough threat from enemy action without adding to it with preventable sources.
194 posted on 07/27/2006 3:21:27 PM PDT by Lucky Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson