While I don't agree with every last detail of this analysis, I found it incisive overall. ~ GMMAC
1 posted on
07/08/2006 9:27:06 AM PDT by
GMMAC
To: fanfan; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...
PING!
2 posted on
07/08/2006 9:28:10 AM PDT by
GMMAC
(Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
To: GMMAC
I'm glad to see you guys finally have some good leadership after all these years.
3 posted on
07/08/2006 9:37:12 AM PDT by
painter
(We celebrate liberty which comes from God not from government.)
To: GMMAC
Yeah but if they don't strengthen the borders, I'm going to let the socialists get back in office!!
< \one-note Johnny>
4 posted on
07/08/2006 9:44:28 AM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
To: GMMAC
3. Social policies The $100 a month grant for children under six met with substantial approval. Its main weakness, none the less, is that a single mother working for a living will keep much less than a mother who stays at home while her husband earns $100,000 a year.
Is this thievery supposed to be "conservative", giving people a hand-out because they have a child?
5 posted on
07/08/2006 9:59:34 AM PDT by
AntiGovernment
(A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson