Pat's wraps it up, and backs W on NK.
1 posted on
07/08/2006 8:22:08 AM PDT by
duckln
To: duckln
I suspect that 'Asia' and part of Europe are already 'dealing' with Il, and their refusal to put an end to his appearing insane is to provoke the reaction our liberals have been promoting since these fireworks went on display.
To: duckln
And just who in Asia is going to stop Kim Jong-Il? Certainly not China - he is their puppet bought and paid for and it is to their advantage to have him attacking us. The South Koreans? Geography is against them. Japan? They need to rearm toute suite. Taiwan? Stymied by the mainland Chinese.
It's in our interests to remove this madman, because when he strikes out, it will be us he is trying to hit.
3 posted on
07/08/2006 8:26:44 AM PDT by
Rummyfan
To: duckln
"Don't just do something. Stand there," Secretary of State Dean Rusk. Hey, I like that. There are certainly times when that is good advice.
4 posted on
07/08/2006 8:28:42 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("I'm all in favor of a dignified retirement: Why not try it on Kerry as a pilot program?" M. Steyn)
To: duckln
We ought to get our soldier-hostages off the DMZ and bring them back to Guam, if not all the way home to the United States. For years I have held this belief, supported by MacArthur as Buchanan mentions.
7 posted on
07/08/2006 8:34:41 AM PDT by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: duckln
That free fireworks display Kim Jong-Il put on for our benefit on July Fourth may prove to have been the best day George Bush has had since Zarqawi went to his eternal reward.
And the worst day for old Pat since Zarqawi died, even though Pat was very pleased that one of those Jooooooz was kidnapped in Israel.
9 posted on
07/08/2006 8:44:01 AM PDT by
AntiGovernment
(A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.)
To: duckln
Ceding the Pacific to China would be dangerous.
To: duckln
Ah, America's great 19th-century warfare specialist...
12 posted on
07/08/2006 8:58:30 AM PDT by
Petronski
(I just love that woman.)
To: duckln
Since we knocked out their ICBM launch 40 seconds off the pad, with plausible deniability, let 'em try again! < /wishful thinking >
15 posted on
07/08/2006 9:05:57 AM PDT by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
To: duckln
Pat's answer to everything, stick your head in the sand. The Republican Party owes Pukeannan since he single handedly destroyed the Reform Party.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
24 posted on
07/08/2006 11:51:55 AM PDT by
bray
(Jeb '08, just to watch their Heads Explode!)
To: duckln
I still see the threat as NK trading missiles/nukes for oil etc, not NK attacking the US. NK gives weapons to Islamic countries, which somehow fall into the nhands of terrorists... That's my worry. There is an Axis of Evil, but it's even larger than the President spoke of. China/Pakistan/Iran/NK...
35 posted on
07/08/2006 2:48:19 PM PDT by
PghBaldy
(God Bless America.)
To: duckln
To: duckln
Kim has also provided compelling evidence that missile defense may not be such a silly right-wing idea after all. Deploying it might turn out to be a boondoggle, but the investment in the science has paid off immeasurably.
51 posted on
07/08/2006 4:13:37 PM PDT by
Zeroisanumber
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: duckln
Should that not be 'Kim Dung Ill'?
53 posted on
07/08/2006 5:38:25 PM PDT by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is never free)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson