Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let Asia deal with Kim Jong-Il (Buchanan)
WND ^ | July 8, 2006 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 07/08/2006 8:22:06 AM PDT by duckln

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: AntiGovernment
Because you played the 'Jooooze' card against a Christian and
it is not true. Despicable thing for you to say.
21 posted on 07/08/2006 10:11:13 AM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AntiGovernment
Pat was very pleased that one of those Jooooooz was kidnapped in Israel.

Completely out of line. Why don't you take your shtick somewhere else.

22 posted on 07/08/2006 10:59:01 AM PDT by Salvey (ancest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

Everybody please cool it.

I will stack up freepers like cordwood if necessary to keep this thread from becoming a flamewar.

Respectful disagreements are healthy. And I'll be the judge of what's respectful.


23 posted on 07/08/2006 11:48:03 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: duckln

Pat's answer to everything, stick your head in the sand. The Republican Party owes Pukeannan since he single handedly destroyed the Reform Party.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


24 posted on 07/08/2006 11:51:55 AM PDT by bray (Jeb '08, just to watch their Heads Explode!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator; bray
Pat's answer to everything, stick your head in the sand.

No, Pat IMO is somewhere between 'stick your head in the sand' and 'jumping into quick sand'. He's a qualified debater that been in the forefront of conservatism for more than your lifetime.

Admin Moderator
Here's another 'hit and run insulter' (bray).
The Republican Party owes Pukeannan since he single handedly destroyed the Reform Party

I didn't post this to be insulted by indirect ad hominid attacks (Pukeannan). Should I have ignored posters who disrupt and attempt to highjack my thread?

25 posted on 07/08/2006 1:12:25 PM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: duckln
I didn't post this to be insulted by indirect ad hominid attacks (Pukeannan). Should I have ignored posters who disrupt and attempt to highjack my thread?


26 posted on 07/08/2006 1:13:59 PM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

As I read Pat's article, he thinks that W is doing the right
thing in North Korea. What do you think?


27 posted on 07/08/2006 1:20:23 PM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: duckln
Don't expect an answer.

Pat writes a column about North Korea; and the Pat Haters want to hijack it and make it about Israel and Antisemitism.

They never want to talk about what's good for the USA; it doesn't interest them.

I think Pat is right about this. The justification for our having troops in South Korea is long gone.

BTW, why is Russia not concerned about NK nukes?
28 posted on 07/08/2006 1:29:21 PM PDT by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

I'm more concerned about what this means for Japan rather than for South Korea. Japan is a strategic partner for the US, not so much South Korea.


29 posted on 07/08/2006 1:32:23 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: duckln
As I read Pat's article, he thinks that W is doing the right thing in North Korea.

Not quite. He said the President did the right thing, not "is doing." Pat agrees with the President only insofar as the President does nothing...not a realistic attitude in the 21st century (or even the 20th), but fine for the 19th.

I trust the President and his judgment, especially since he has better information than me about the capabilities of the rocket, not because of any haphazard reading of history by the likes of Buchanan.

Any agreement between Buchanan and the proper course of action is purely coincident.

30 posted on 07/08/2006 1:38:02 PM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rcocean; Toddsterpatriot; SJackson; Alouette
Don't expect an answer.

If you are referring to me, I will kindly invite you to go to hell.

...hijack it and make it about Israel and Antisemitism.

Only because Pat is all about Israel and anti-Semitism.

31 posted on 07/08/2006 1:39:55 PM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
"Only because Pat is all about Israel and anti-Semitism."

Thank you for pointing out the obvious!

It is clear to any right-thinking person that Pat's stance toward NK is rabid antisemitism at it worst!

Everyone knows that Pat's favoring withdrawal of troops from South Korea is just his way of secretly supporting the withdrawal of IDF forces from Palestine.

Thank you for pointing this out so that we can continue to expose Pat as the demonic antisemite that he continues to be!

/sarcasm

32 posted on 07/08/2006 1:56:59 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

"I'm more concerned about what this means for Japan rather than for South Korea. Japan is a strategic partner for the US, not so much South Korea."

Well, Japan already has to deal with China and Russia, both nuclear powers. Would NK as a nuclear power make that much difference?

What I find puzzling is the Russian attitude. China & NK are both commies. But why isn't Putin upset about having a crazy, third world dictator with Nuclear bombs right on his doorstep?


33 posted on 07/08/2006 2:02:19 PM PDT by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Your obsession with Pat has long become boring and pathetic.

Too bad you hate Pat and don't care to comment on any issue that affects the USA and doesn't involve the middle east.

But frankly, who cares? I don't.

Why don't you leave and start a thread about WW II, and talk about Pat and what happened 60 years ago? I'm sure Uncle Leo would be interested.


34 posted on 07/08/2006 2:08:31 PM PDT by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: duckln

I still see the threat as NK trading missiles/nukes for oil etc, not NK attacking the US. NK gives weapons to Islamic countries, which somehow fall into the nhands of terrorists... That's my worry. There is an Axis of Evil, but it's even larger than the President spoke of. China/Pakistan/Iran/NK...


35 posted on 07/08/2006 2:48:19 PM PDT by PghBaldy (God Bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Only because Pat is all about Israel and anti-Semitism.

Come on, Pat's not an anti-Semite. He just hates Jews.

36 posted on 07/08/2006 2:51:20 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Japan should be given nuclear weapons - in a very public way.

if their people won't stand for it because of their "Hiroshim complex" - tough. I say to the Japanese, if you don't want to get nuked a third time by NK, get some nuclear weapons fast.


37 posted on 07/08/2006 2:54:44 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Exactly. And it's part of the reason we need to keep our guys over there. The chicoms want control of the sealanes/trade routes. The free world can't afford for that to happen.


38 posted on 07/08/2006 2:56:30 PM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: duckln

later


39 posted on 07/08/2006 2:57:53 PM PDT by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
But frankly, who cares? I don't.

That's why you're keeping track of my posts and giving me such long responses. LOL

40 posted on 07/08/2006 3:13:23 PM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson