You said:
"In High Crimes and Misdemeanors Coulter wondered if Clinton should be impeached or assassinated."
The actual book quote is:
"In this recurring nightmare of a presidency, we have a national debate about whether he "did it," even though all sentient people know he did. Otherwise there would be debates only about whether to impeach or assassinate."
Even a chemistry professor should have the literacy to see that those are radically different things. That latter is called "humor."
Even the most rabid Coulter hating sites (which I'm sure you frequent) don't cite this quote. Except the Soros paid stooge at Media Matters, David Brock. Who is being paid to try to discredit Coulter and block her from CNN and elsewhere.
BTW, I'm told the New Times Book Review has just decided that "High Crimes And Misdemeanors" was a "scholarly book."
I guess they didn't read it with your objectivity, Professor
(And only creeps with chips on their shoulders and inferiority complexes call themselves "professors" in my experience. But I'm not familiar with the high-flying world of teaching chemistry.)
If you think discussing the assassination of the president is a joke, I suspect you have a rather tense conversation with the Secret Service in your future. It wasn't funny. And it wasn't an accident. I've shown how she does it over and over and over again. And here's another clue; Jon Stewart does not footnote his 'humor' in a pseudo-academic fashion. Coulter claims what she writes is serious. She can't then try to evade responsibility by claiming it was just a joke.
Your attempts at smearing me as a leftist are pathetic.
The conductors of traveling minstrel orchestras have customarily called themselves "professor" as well.