Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robowombat

The blasphemy of the story isn't that he married or had children, but that the crucifixion was a hoax (or at least that Jesus never really died on the cross), and that he and Magdelene moved out of the region after they faked Jesus' death on the cross.

No crucifixion = no resurrection = no salvation for man through the blood of the lamb. That's what's really wrong with the story, and the one that keeps being missed in the press. Further, the novel suggests that the "real" teachings of Jesus are absent from the Gospels as part of a conspiracy of the founders of the Church, so the message you have is "wrong".


18 posted on 05/24/2006 1:10:59 PM PDT by leoncaruthers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: leoncaruthers
Good grief what a hackneyed bit of fakery. Right out of that 60's artifact Schoenfield's 'The Passover Plot'.
19 posted on 05/24/2006 1:15:37 PM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson