Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Discovery Prospects at the Large Hadron Collider
Brookhaven National Laboratory ^ | 23 April 2006 | Staff (press release)

Posted on 04/25/2006 7:21:47 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Big science, happening in Europe. Whatcha gonna do?
1 posted on 04/25/2006 7:21:51 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing
An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.

2 posted on 04/25/2006 7:23:07 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

We need an accelerator like this to find the 'conservo-neuterino' that causes Republican cojones to shrink past the event horizon of political consciousness once they're elected to DC.


3 posted on 04/25/2006 7:27:07 AM PDT by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Whatever happened to the Texas Supercollider project? I know it got scrapped, but what happened to the site itself?


4 posted on 04/25/2006 7:30:32 AM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

5 posted on 04/25/2006 7:39:02 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

6 posted on 04/25/2006 7:43:08 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Cool article. But I am getting a little jealous of European science. They are going after more pure research like that to be accomplished with the LHC. I wish I was better at explaining why this sort of this is so critical to do. To many people have the attitude that if private enterprise won't do it, then it isn't worth doing. The technical spin offs from just building the thing are impressive enough. But what free market would think looking for the Higgs boson would be a direct money maker?


7 posted on 04/25/2006 7:48:10 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

Took you two tries to post that crying baby picture, eh? Oh, well...


8 posted on 04/25/2006 7:48:45 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

--Took you two tries to post that crying baby picture, eh? ---Oh, well...

Yep, first time I've ever done it. By the way...it was a response to a question, not the article.


9 posted on 04/25/2006 7:52:16 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Couldn't the creation of a Higgs-Boson Particle be really dangerous
10 posted on 04/25/2006 7:57:44 AM PDT by Igthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Big science, happening in Europe. Whatcha gonna do?

We let it get away, but building the Super-collider ("Super-Clyde") would have eaten much of the national science budget for some time. Tough call either way.

11 posted on 04/25/2006 8:01:25 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

I think they just dumped rubble in it and capped it off.


12 posted on 04/25/2006 8:02:37 AM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Where is America's Superconducting Supercollider? For that matter, where is America's moon base?


13 posted on 04/25/2006 8:31:00 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

LOL!


14 posted on 04/25/2006 8:53:53 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
We let it get away, but building the Super-collider ("Super-Clyde") would have eaten much of the national science budget for some time.

The SSC was its own line item; it didn't come out of the DOE budget.

And then you have to ask what science was funded by the windfall of the SSC cancellation.

15 posted on 04/25/2006 9:17:44 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping!


16 posted on 04/25/2006 9:40:13 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

This is probably old but I saw it for the first time last week .


The new element has been named *Governmentium*.
Governmentium (Gv) has one neutron, 25 assistant neutrons, 88 deputy
neutrons, and 198 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of
312.

These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are
surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons.

Since Governmentium has no electrons, it is inert.
However, it can be detected, because it impedes every reaction with
which it comes into contact. A minute amount of Governmentium can cause
a reaction that would normally take less than a second to take over four
days to complete.

Governmentium does not decay, but instead undergoes a reorganization in
which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange
places. In fact, Governmentium's mass will actually increase over time,
since each reorganization will cause more morons to become neutrons,
forming isodopes.

This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to believe
that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a critical
concentration! This hypothetical quantity is referred to as Critical
Morass.

When catalyzed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium - an
element which radiates just as much energy as Governmentium since it has
half as many peons but twice as many morons."


17 posted on 04/25/2006 10:20:17 AM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grjr21

LOL! -- if it was old, I hadn't seen it before. Thanks.


18 posted on 04/25/2006 10:48:27 AM PDT by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Good points. What I was saying had been put forth in some arguments at the time, but clearly there's another side to the story.
19 posted on 04/25/2006 12:27:49 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Good science. Soon to islamic Europe.


20 posted on 04/25/2006 10:20:50 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson