Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China and Russia Wary of Call for Iran Sanctions
The New York Times ^ | March 30, 2006 | JOEL BRINKLEY

Posted on 03/30/2006 12:04:06 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

BERLIN, March 30 — A day after the United Nations Security Council approved a heavily compromised statement criticizing the Iranian nuclear program, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice today raised the idea of imposing sanctions on Iran for the first time with the permament members of the council but received a decidedly cool reaction from China and Russia.

During a news conference after a three and one-half hour meeting here today, Dai Bingguo, China's vice minister of foreign affairs, rejected the idea of sanctions and offered a thinly veiled criticism of the war in Iraq when he said, "The Chinese side feels there has already been enough turmoil in the Middle East. We don't need any more turmoil."

The Security Council approved the statement on Wednesday after three weeks of debate, and Ms. Rice praised it, even though it was far weaker than the one the United States had originally proposed. It calls on the International Atomic Energy Agency to report within 30 days on Iran's progress toward curtailing its nuclear development work.

Ms. Rice noted that Russia had wanted to strip out the language calling for a referral to the Security Council but had relented under American pressure.

As it is, both Russia and China bluntly declared that they had no interest in imposing sanctions or taking any further action against Iran, though both countries did express concern about the nuclear program. Both countries said they wanted to refer the issue back to the atomic energy agency.

"Russia believes that the sole solution for this problem will be based on the work of the I.A.E.A.," said the Russian foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: china; iran; iraniansanctions; nukes; russia

1 posted on 03/30/2006 12:04:07 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Title on the non-printer article is different and somewhat misleading, see it here:

Security Council Rejects Calls for Sanctions on Iran

2 posted on 03/30/2006 12:07:13 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Well...I would say that's probably like the Victoria Secrets thong design division refusing Pamela Anderson's shopping sprees.


...or something like that


3 posted on 03/30/2006 12:07:52 PM PST by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Wait until the Chechens or the Urghurs get ahold of the nuclear bomb and then we'll see what they think about waepons proliferation.


4 posted on 03/30/2006 12:32:36 PM PST by steel_resolve (An intolerant culture will seek to impose it's will on the tolerant one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Russia and China need to fall off one side of the fence or the other.


5 posted on 03/30/2006 12:43:01 PM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia

They're already on the opposite side of the fence as us; just not admitting it yet for strategic reasons.


6 posted on 03/30/2006 12:59:45 PM PST by sfrepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"China's vice minister of foreign affairs, rejected the idea of sanctions and offered a thinly veiled criticism of the war in Iraq when he said, 'The Chinese side feels there has already been enough turmoil in the Middle East. We don't need any more turmoil.'"

In other words, the Chinese and Russian governments want Iran to build nukes in order to scare (or to nuke) our forces out of western Asia and eastern Europe.

US TOLD TO LEAVE CENTRAL ASIA [Russia & China demand "deadline."]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1437369/posts

It will be interesting to see as to whether our leaders run and desert from the war on terror (as Iran is the hub) and neo-fascism (Russia and China). The alternative would be to invade, occupy and re-educate Iran (to stop Iranian sentiment toward building nukes in future decades--see denazification and outlawing of germanification after WWII).
7 posted on 03/30/2006 1:47:07 PM PST by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It used to be that the international appeasement crowd used sanctions as a way to avoid war. Now, the international appeasement crowd (in this case, with substantial pressure from the two sponsoring states of the Iranian regime) find sanctions to be too hard core. What's left, sending nasty emails to Tehran? Twiddling thumbs? Drinking heavily and simply hoping things get better?


8 posted on 03/30/2006 1:52:22 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia

They need to fall off a cliff.


9 posted on 03/30/2006 1:53:07 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Come on, the Chicomms and Soviet Russians are our friends!


10 posted on 03/30/2006 1:54:09 PM PST by samcgwire ("I voted for President 'Better Than Kerry'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson