Skip to comments.
Democrats Pledge to 'Eliminate' Osama ("responsible redeployment of U.S. forces" from Iraq in 2006)
AP on Yahoo ^
| 3/28/06
| Liz Sidoti - ap
Posted on 03/28/2006 6:07:17 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Hmmmm?? Their beloved leader (Bubba Clinton) didn't think it was so important to get Osama .. and I didn't see or hear any rukus about Clinton refusing to take Osama when he had the chance - and this was after the WTC 1993 incident when it was pretty obvious Osama was involved.
These people are making a promise they know they cannot keep - and they're hoping the "stupid public" will not remember that promise. Sorry dems .. but that will not fly anymore.
61
posted on
03/28/2006 7:24:32 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Democrats/Old Media: "controversy, crap and confusion" -- Amen!)
To: NormsRevenge
All slogans and no plans. This is even stupidier then I expected it to be.
62
posted on
03/28/2006 7:28:43 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(The Left has their own coalition, "The Coalition of the Whining". ---Beagle8U)
To: mystery-ak
I don't mind, this is Free Republic!
63
posted on
03/28/2006 7:29:22 PM PST
by
smoothsailing
(FIRE MURTHA-Support Diana Irey--http://www.irey.com)
To: Killborn
But, how do you REALLY feel?
64
posted on
03/28/2006 7:31:31 PM PST
by
jpl
("We don't negotiate with terrorists, we put them out of business." - Scott McClellan)
To: jpl
ROFL! I love that line. :)
Like that, I guess.
65
posted on
03/28/2006 7:33:16 PM PST
by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: JerseyDvl
" hate to say it but they will gain traction with this."
Well then you expose yourself as a pseudo Conservative DNC mouthpiece. There no PLAN here. All there is is some vague words and nonsensical slogans. There is NOTHING here. ONLY a dyed in the wool Democrat could think this nonsensical and empty rhetoric would "gain traction". It did NOT work for John Kerry in 2004 to whine endlessly about "not getting Bin Laden", it will not work for these clowns in 2006
66
posted on
03/28/2006 7:33:59 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(The Left has their own coalition, "The Coalition of the Whining". ---Beagle8U)
To: NormsRevenge
"In the position paper to be announced Wednesday, Democrats say they will double the number of special forces and add more spies, which they suggest will increase the chances of finding al-Qaida's elusive leader."
Osama is a figurehead and little more. It might feel good to catch him but it will do essentially nothing to stem the tide of Islamic terrorism. Now, if he had been caught in the 90's it might have made a difference, but at this point it is pretty meaningless. Clearly the dems are attempting to appeal to the emotions, rather than rational thinking, of Americans. I think I'll pass on the Dem's "Real Security" (TM).
67
posted on
03/28/2006 7:36:05 PM PST
by
Avenger
To: NormsRevenge
"In the position paper to be announced Wednesday, Democrats say they will double the number of special forces and add more spies, which they suggest will increase the chances of finding al-Qaida's elusive leader."
Oh damn! Why didn't anyone in the Bush administration think of that? How could they be so stupid? Stupid...or maybe Michael Moore was right.../sarcasm
68
posted on
03/28/2006 7:40:38 PM PST
by
Avenger
To: NormsRevenge
"Bush's job approval ratings are in the mid- to high-30s,"
Rasmussen has had Bush in the mid to low 40's.
In fact, yesterday Raz had Bush at 45%.
To: Yo-Yo
So let's hear the Dim's whine that goes "if we didn't outsource our offense when we had Osama pinned down at Tora Bora..." Why didn't Clintotn cruise missle Osama when we were monitoring his cell phone?
To: NormsRevenge
Democrats say they will double the number of special forces I have never served in the military..but if you "double" the number of "special" troops..would that make them special..aren't they special for the reason that they are the best of the best..maybe someone from a military background could explain better than me..or how about this..this just in from nfl.com..the annual pro bowl roster will go from about 90 to 200..this way we have greater number of great players..does it work that way????? (and no..pro football players are no where near the hard work of our military)
To: NormsRevenge
The demoRATS have a plan!
!!! FINALLY, AFTER ALMOST FIVE YEARS !!!
They have a plan!
They have decided to get Bin Laden?
Wow!
Didn't Clinton try to get Bin Laden too?
Then again, their secret weapon is none other than:
George Clooney and his gang!
To: docman57
The demoRATS have a plan!
!!! FINALLY, AFTER ALMOST FIVE YEARS !!!
They have a plan!
They have decided to get Bin Laden?
Wow!
Didn't Clinton try to get Bin Laden too?
Then again, their secret weapon is none other than:
George Clooney and his gang!
To: jpl; Killborn
re: #60
But, how do you REALLY feel? You stole my thunder!
btw, multiply it by 100x and that is how I feel.
74
posted on
03/28/2006 8:00:44 PM PST
by
Christian4Bush
(FreeRepublic and Rush Limbaugh: kevlar protection from the Drive-By Media.)
To: crushelits
These Demo-left jacka$$es couldn't hit the floor if they fell on it. So long as the RNC does its job, and the New Media is around to keep the Drive-By Media in check, we should be ok.
That said, I think we better "cowboy up"...this year is going to make 2004 look like a Boy Scout convention.
75
posted on
03/28/2006 8:03:48 PM PST
by
Christian4Bush
(FreeRepublic and Rush Limbaugh: kevlar protection from the Drive-By Media.)
To: Christian4Bush
Sorry. :P
Glad that we agree. :)
76
posted on
03/28/2006 8:31:00 PM PST
by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: builder
What a stinking pile...the Democrats are the reason we have no human intelligence capability. Between Senator Frank Church, Jimmy Crater and Slick, they axed all our assets and made the methods illegal.
To: Proudcongal
Yeah right. Wonder how the anti-war crowd is going to take this.I'm not brave enough to go to the DUmmies and check out the ranting and raving, but maybe someone else is.
78
posted on
03/28/2006 9:26:22 PM PST
by
hsalaw
To: NormsRevenge
79
posted on
03/28/2006 10:16:54 PM PST
by
SR 50
(Larry)
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
*barf alert* ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my miscellaneous ping list.
80
posted on
03/28/2006 11:27:29 PM PST
by
nutmeg
(NEVER trust democRATs with our national security)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson