Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crushelits
The president has to walk a narrow line between 1) convincing the Muslim world that this is a War on Terror as opposed to a War on Islam and 2) maintaining national security. On this issue he was really in a Catch-22, since he really couldn't explain this logic publicly for fear of showing his hand to the Muslim world- This ultimately is a War on Islam.

The west cannot afford to fight 1.2 billion Muslims now, so the best hope is to "divide and conquer." To that end, the president is currently going after the more radical elements of Islam (terrorists) with the WOT with the hope of westernizing future generations of Muslims given the time and access to do so. In the mean time he tries to encourage the more moderate Islamic nations (like UAE) and treating them fairly in trade is one way to do that.

This strategy is truly our only hope unless we're prepared to engage in mass genocide. You have undoubtedly noted how easy it is to rally the relatively uneducated Muslim masses into a violent frenzy over the silly cartoon issue and I expect they would do far worse if they knew the west were engaged in a War on Islam.

The Muslim culture is not easily assimilated into a western society, so this will be a supremely difficult challenge. If we can't figure out how to do it, we're doomed to death, dhimmitude (as we're seeing indications of in Europe), or a lot of innocent blood on our hands.
44 posted on 03/10/2006 8:59:22 PM PST by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rockitz

An excellent post.


173 posted on 03/10/2006 10:58:19 PM PST by fragrant abuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

"The Muslim culture is not easily assimilated into a western society, so this will be a supremely difficult challenge. If we can't figure out how to do it, we're doomed to death, dhimmitude (as we're seeing indications of in Europe), or a lot of innocent blood on our hands."

Ummm... define innocent blood. If you mean killing people whose religion requires our death or slavery, I think I can handle it. Attempting to assimilate Muslim culture into our own has proved a miserable failure in the US, and all across Europe. That's the reason we're deployed in the ME right now. Welcoming their culture to our shores is either inviting or hastening defeat.


239 posted on 03/11/2006 12:16:03 AM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Rockitz

Your post is full of wild assumptions and faulty logic. We could easily win a war against 1.2 billion Muslims if we really wanted to. Bush in his wildest dreams wouldn't even think of it. After all just last week he called Pakistan a "great Arab nation".


342 posted on 03/11/2006 5:28:25 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson