Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: royalcello
We've crossed pens before, IIRC, royalcello. Despite the fact that I would be a member of the old nobility (medieval origins) were the traditional monarchies restored wholesale in Western Europe, I really find the arguments for restoration (other than as complete figureheads as they are in Britain, Scandinavia and the Low Countries) unperuasive to the point of risibility. Especially if one looks at the available royalty. The remaining Habsburgs, Hohenzollerns, Wittlesbachs, Bourbons, Savoyards are none of them capable of running a reasonable sized business, let alone running real countries with vital economies and tens of millions of inhabitants. I know some of these people. They're pleasant enough to have dinner with or to spend a day hunting or chat with at the opera or the theater, but actually RUN France? or Italy? or Germany? I don't think so. The Spanish king is but a figurehead, and the Spanish are as feckless as ever.

No, monarchy as a serious way of running modern countries went out of fashion because it did not work well, and too many of the members of the various royal families of Europe were at best incompetent, if well-meaning.

71 posted on 02/20/2006 12:48:42 PM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: CatoRenasci
Otto von Habsburg and Franz Duke of Bavaria are intelligent, well-educated, and accomplished men who are more than worthy of the thrones of their ancestors.

Even the less impressive royals could hardly do worse than the current crop of European politicians.

Assuming that Europe's rejection of monarchy refutes monarchism is as illogical as it would be to assume that Europe's rejection of Christianity refutes Christianity.

72 posted on 02/20/2006 2:33:03 PM PST by royalcello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: CatoRenasci; royalcello

Maybe the West can have a look at what happened to each Chinese dynasty: each time a dynasty replaced the next, it had always been an overthrowing as the successor claimed each previous dynasty had "lost the mandate of heaven". You can have:

1) Vassal state overthrowing the previous dyansty: Shang Tang overthrrew Xia dynasty and founded the Shang dynasty in 1751 BC. In Chinese history texts they are called "Nobility revolutions".

2) Peasant rebellion and taking the throne himself: Liu Bang did this to the Qin dynasty in 206 BC and founded the Han dynasty (one of the most glorious Chinese dynasties), and Zhu Yuanzhang over threw the Mongol Yuan dynasty in AD 1386 and founded the Ming dynasty. They are called "Peasant revolutions" in Chinese history.

3) In-laws taking over the thronw: Yang Jian overthrew his son-in-law's throne in Northern Zhou and founded the Sui dyansty in AD 581.

4) Generals taking over the emperor in a coup: Li Yuan did this to Sui dynasty in 618 AD and founded the Tang dyansty, Zhu Wen did this to the Tang in AD 907, Zhao Kuangyin plotted a coup and became the first emperor of the Sung dynasty in 960 AD.

5) Foreign invasion: the Yuan and Qing dynasties conquered China.

It may give a better chance of getting a competent ruler on the throne, because you get to throw the bums out once every 200 to 300 years. How about allowing this in Europe?


73 posted on 02/20/2006 5:10:19 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Leftism is like honey mixed with arsenic: initially it tastes good, but that will end up killing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson