Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debate swirls as wind power grows rapidly across country
ap on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 1/1/06 | John Christofferson - ap

Posted on 01/01/2006 12:25:56 PM PST by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 01/01/2006 12:25:58 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

While windmills may evoke quaint images of yesteryear, they're sparking growing debate, particularly as the first offshore projects are proposed in popular tourist areas, such as Cape Cod, Long Island, N.Y., and the New Jersey shore. Critics, including a member of the influential Kennedy family, worry that some projects could harm national treasures.

"All of a sudden you're transferring an asset used by 5 million people into the hands of private industrial speculators," said Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an environmentalist who has objected to the Cape Cod proposal.


2 posted on 01/01/2006 12:26:41 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Don't the climate fanatics worry that diverting and slowing the prevailing wind patterns will cause; a) climate change, b) changing the earth's rotation or c) heating by compression?
3 posted on 01/01/2006 12:29:31 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Probably knows he won't get his 40% markup.


4 posted on 01/01/2006 12:29:56 PM PST by babydoll22 (If you stop growing as a person you live in your own private hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

NIMBY syndrome alert!

If they did not have Kennedy and Kerry MA would have no wind.


5 posted on 01/01/2006 12:29:58 PM PST by oxcart (Remember Bush lied.......People DYED... THEIR FINGERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"If we could just find a way to make them invisible," Gray said, "we'd have something everybody could get behind."

I wonder how long it will be before some congresscritter tries to make a law.

6 posted on 01/01/2006 12:33:08 PM PST by Fzob (Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
experts expect wind to generate at least 5 percent by 2020.

Insufficient. Non-OPEC oil production will level out in ten years, and OPEC production will decline substantially by 2026 or 2030. Nukes is the only cost-effective way to go, or relax the constraints on coal plants.

7 posted on 01/01/2006 12:33:11 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Watch utilities grow parallel power capacity in nuclear and coal plants to keep power cached when rotors stand still [exerience in Germany which has highest prop power in world].

This drives up the cost of the whole system since it increases redundancy. Green logic for you.
8 posted on 01/01/2006 12:36:58 PM PST by seppel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

agreed. nukes now, and then fusion.


9 posted on 01/01/2006 12:38:37 PM PST by seppel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Put some of those Windmills in D.C.plenty of blow hards there


10 posted on 01/01/2006 12:40:42 PM PST by al baby (Father of the beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Well, does this mean that Nuclear power is now back on the table?


11 posted on 01/01/2006 12:42:02 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Kennedy & Kerry do not want eysores fouling up the vista's from their dacha's. Let the scum freeze in the dark!


12 posted on 01/01/2006 12:44:55 PM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

I saw a report that said massive use of windmills does indeed have climate altering effects because the air is heated as energy is extracted. On a small scale there will be micro climate effects in the vicinity of a large windmill farm and on a macro scale there will be significant atmospheric heating. There is no free lunch.


13 posted on 01/01/2006 12:51:35 PM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saganite
I saw a report that said massive use of windmills does indeed have climate altering effects because the air is heated as energy is extracted. On a small scale there will be micro climate effects in the vicinity of a large windmill farm and on a macro scale there will be significant atmospheric heating. There is no free lunch.

Sounds like hogwash to me. What about the energy transferred by bending trees as winds flow through forests? Or the energy used to form whitecaps on oceans?

14 posted on 01/01/2006 12:55:39 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: saganite
--macro scale there will be significant atmospheric heating.--

--on about the same scale, it will slow down the rotation of the earth, thus making days longer and also adding to the sun's heating effect---WE'RE DOOMED--

15 posted on 01/01/2006 12:59:05 PM PST by rellimpank (Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle
What about the energy transferred by bending trees as winds flow through forests? Or the energy used to form whitecaps on oceans?

The laws of physics would say that there would be some heat generated by both.

16 posted on 01/01/2006 1:02:31 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Oh yes. Some power companies are already getting their permits.


17 posted on 01/01/2006 1:05:36 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Wind projects have sparked complaints around the country that the windmills cause noise, obstruct scenic views and kill wildlife, including thousands of federally protected birds in California.

If the enviro-fascists weren't such hypocrites they might find themselves in bit of a pickle with these windmills.

18 posted on 01/01/2006 1:10:52 PM PST by manwiththehands (My wish for the new year: I wish Republicans were running the country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Nukes is the only cost-effective way to go, or relax the constraints on coal plants.

The envirowackos are making coal more expensive every day.

Ariz. mine closure throws Indians out of work
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | 1/1/2006 | John M. Broder
Posted on 01/01/2006 12:28:36 PM PST by bkwells

Nevada power plant to close after dispute
AP ^ | 12/30/5
Posted on 12/30/2005 8:01:33 AM PST by SmithL

19 posted on 01/01/2006 1:16:49 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Oil - Too icky
Coal - Too dirty
Nuclear - Don't even think about it
Wind - Kills birds and lowers the Kennedy's property values
Hydroelectric - Snail Darter
Wood - Tree killer


20 posted on 01/01/2006 1:20:44 PM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson