Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
There have been a few very interesting threads on this subject over the last couple of years, and this is the first time I've seen this kind of speculation about the "star" actually being daytime planetary conjunctions.

Some of the folks who posted on these other threads made some very compelling cases for what the Star of Bethlehem was, and based on a number of these points I've concluded the following: If the information presented in the New Testament was accurate, then: 1) the "star" was not a comet, or supernova, or other such unusual celestial phenomenon; and 2) the Magi did not use the "star" to guide them to the right place.

4 posted on 12/29/2005 4:42:22 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Said the night wind to the little lamb . . . "Do you see what I see?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

If the star was just an ordinary celestial event, then it would have been visible to everyone; and Herod's own astrologers or interpreters would have seen it as early as the Wise Men did, and it would have come as no surprise.

But the text says that all Jerusalem was troubled when they heard that sages had arrived saying they had seen the star announcing the birth of the messiah.

So most likely none of the ordinary explanations fit.


5 posted on 12/29/2005 4:52:30 PM PST by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson