To: abclily
"Here is the substance of her ignorance: Not knowing or caring about the emotions of young children. Pure ignorance. And a bit sadistic besides."
Yes, I don't think she was really concerned about the children. It sounded like she was overly concerned with herself, IMHO. The amount of "I's" and "Me's" in her statement showed her own narcissistic temperament.
173 posted on
12/26/2005 9:29:15 AM PST by
khnyny
(Merry Christmas)
To: khnyny
"Yes, I don't think she was really concerned about the children. It sounded like she was overly concerned with herself, IMHO."
"No public school teacher should be required to teach a belief, or custom, or religion that he or she believes to be false, or be required to pass those purported falsehoods onto impressionable children, without the right to state a disclaimer."
Sounds like caring about them a great deal.
181 posted on
12/26/2005 9:31:00 AM PST by
Conservatrix
("He who stands for nothing will fall for anything.")
To: khnyny
The amount of "I's" and "Me's" in her statement showed her own narcissistic temperament.<<...Reminds me of the statement...So heavenly bound..No earthly good!
538 posted on
12/26/2005 5:11:36 PM PST by
M-cubed
(Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson