I assume "strategery" is involved in this nondisclosure
It's very "possiblistic". ;-)
Good assumption.
One has to understand how we are fighting (and winning) the war on Islamofascism. First of all 911 must be seen as very much like Pearl Harbor--a tremendous mistake by the enemy. We were successful in Afganistan, but mainly all we did was bust up the schools and training camps--a good thing. But the terror network was worlldwide and loose.
By going into Iraq we did two things, we brought freedom and democracy into the HEART of Arab/Moslim culture, and we became a target for terrorists there. We wanted the loose terrorists to come to us on Iraqi soil to be killed. So we wanted to attract them by appearing weak as possible. Here's where the Dims played as useful idiots. they helped us appear weak and encouraged the terrorists with the false idea the they could defeat us. Hiding the evidence of WMD and Saddam-Alqaeda links encouraged the Dims.
We wanted to leave Zaquari(sp? free to keep calling to terrorists to go to Iraq. the terrorists thought that the Americans had technology but could not stand up in a fire fight. Boy were they wrong. Our troops, especially Rummy's small-footprint killer elite can shoot well. they have been well trained. And the Islamists can't hit sh*t. They leave their cell phones and laptops with their dead. Our troops turn over the electronic pieces to intelligence. Someday soon, when the Iraq borders are closed, etc. Bush will tell all.
I assume so! My guess is that there are on going operations that would be compromised if he did so.