To: neverdem
Odd. Why would he sit on it and not release it?
4 posted on
12/22/2005 10:07:31 PM PST by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: pbrown
>"Odd. Why would he sit on it and not release it?"I believe it's the old Rove Ropadope Rug Yank. Be patient grasshopper.
ABC CBS NBC CNN its all the SAME, Propaganda.
Might as well call them all AmeriJazerra.
Show them how much Gravitas Hugh Bris has. Vote with your remote! Shut down the Alphabet channels.
He's Got A Plan
Zippo Hero
Kill A Commie For Mommie
Seven Dead Monkeys Page O Tunes
14 posted on
12/22/2005 10:27:42 PM PST by
rawcatslyentist
(Why waste time learning when ignorance is instantaneous---Hobbes the Tiger)
To: pbrown
Odd. Why would he sit on it and not release it? Could they be saving ammunition for the 2006 election ?
15 posted on
12/22/2005 10:31:17 PM PST by
oldbrowser
(Release the Barrett Report)
To: pbrown
Because that which involved Iraq is intertwined with ongoing investigations into a global proliferation network whose reach we have not yet determined, and which may yet require some covert diplomatic and or military creativity on our part, which is likely to be more successful if done by surprise. By releasing info we have on Iraq we could inadvertantly tell others what we know about their activities, giving them time to prepare.
37 posted on
12/22/2005 11:29:38 PM PST by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: pbrown
Because of who all's involved. France, Germany, Spain, Russia, China, Syria, Iran, North Korea, etc.
Imagine what would happen if we exposed France, Germany and Russia as having helped Iraq develop a whole new line of WMDs while Clinton stood by and did nothing. Alot of alliances would crumble. Not that I'd shed any tears on some, but we're gonna need the EU AND Russia in the coming war with China.
It would also reveal what we really know and how we know it. Could get alot of deep cover operatives killed.
Of special note is that more terrorist attacks occurred against the United States during the Clinton years than any other President in history. And Slick Willy did little or nothing about it, except take a payoffs from the UN.
To: pbrown
.....Why would he sit on it and not release it?....
W goes to battle at a "time and place of my choosing"
He has not yet choose a time and place.
78 posted on
12/23/2005 8:32:35 AM PST by
bert
(K.E. ; N.P . Slay Pinch)
To: pbrown
Odd. Why would he sit on it and not release it? Timing is everything. Knowing Bush, its more important to have a Republican successor, than it is destroying a couple loud mouthed Democrat Senators.
89 posted on
12/23/2005 10:12:09 AM PST by
Go Gordon
(I don't know what your problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce)
To: pbrown; neverdem; Mr. Mojo
I will tell you guys EXACTLY why he is sitting on this.
That information is PROBABLY still classified. Think back to your own reaction to the wiretaps and the radiation detector stories.
If the information didn't still have any use, they probably would have found a way to declassify it. But that isn't the case, and I can only draw ONE conclusion, that is, the information that has been found and translated is still giving the US forces in Iraq inroads and intel into what Saddam and our enemies have been up too.
It's all about security. Thankfully this White House understands that.
97 posted on
12/23/2005 3:12:03 PM PST by
MikefromOhio
(It's amazing that a guy says he wants to nuke parts of America ON FR, but he doesn't get zotted)
To: pbrown
I've wondered this myself. Maybe, the only thing I can think, is that maybe it reveals massive involvment with Russia and China.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson