[Roots]

My point was that you're trying to base your argument not on evidence of the safety of sonogram machines but rather on the credibility of the "messenger". I don't have experience just as a blind man can't tell if the sky is blue, but that doesn't mean the color of the sky is disputable. "There are no substantiated side-effects documented in studies." It is pointless to debate "experience," you wouldn't take your doctor's opinion as "absolute" just as I don't take my professor's anti-Bush statements to be absolute either...

Therefore, there is no compelling reason for him NOT to do frequent ultrasounds on a developing baby, but you chose to attack him anyway...

[Qwertrew]

Attack? Gee-willikers, I asked if the poster had experience.

Calm down and move on.

[mewzilla]

Have there been any safety studies on pregnant women who have repeated ultrasounds?