Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1.5m Chinese 'descendants of one man'
BBC News ^ | November 1, 2005

Posted on 11/05/2005 9:38:10 AM PST by billorites

Research into an unusually high prevalence of a particular set of genes in China has suggested that 1.5 million Chinese men are direct descendants of Giocangga, the grandfather of the founder of the Qing dynasty.

Giocangga's extraordinary number of descendants, concentrated mainly in north-east China and Mongolia, are thought to be a result of the many wives and concubines his offspring took.

Dr Chris Tyler-Smith, a geneticist working at Britain's Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, made the finding, based on a study of a set of genes on the male Y chromosome.

He told the BBC World Service's Science In Action programme that these genes provided a "genetic surname" of the family to which each man belonged.

"What we did was analyse around 1,000 men from that part of the world," he said.

"We noticed just two types of Y chromosome that were extraordinarily frequent - one of them making up around 3% of our sample.

"When we looked at it more carefully, we found that it was not present in the majority population in that area, the Han. But in the minorities, including the Mongolians, it was present at around 5%."

'Good chance of survival'

Scientists were then able to work out roughly where the special genes came from.

They established the origin was north-east China, around 500 years ago.

More accurate analysis then found that this particular genetic code first appeared just before the Qing dynasty, which came to the fore in 1616 and had conquered China by 1644.

"We soon realised there was a major historical event going on at this time - the establishment of the Qing dynasty, which conquered China and ruled for several hundred years," Dr Tyler-Smith said.

"It was ruled by the Qing imperial nobility, who were a highly privileged elite class, and they had several wives and concubines.

"Because of the privilege, they could have had many children - and those children would have had a good chance of survival."

At the time of Giocangga, the population of China was about 100 million - compared with 1.3 billion today.

This means that the average Chinese man at the time of Giocangga would only have around 20 descendants living today - in marked contrast to Giocangga's 1.5 million men.

"The difference is accounted for by the large number of wives and concubines - and in particular, this practice being linked to the Y chromosome for many generations," Dr Tyler-Smith added.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigforearms; buckteeth; squinting

1 posted on 11/05/2005 9:38:10 AM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: billorites

and you thought little willie clintoon spread it all around!


2 posted on 11/05/2005 9:39:34 AM PST by soltice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Holy cannoli. That's a lot of mouths to feed. ;) And it means that this man literally could field an army out of his britches...


3 posted on 11/05/2005 9:40:05 AM PST by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Ah. And would this be the famous Won Hung Lo?


4 posted on 11/05/2005 9:41:22 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

I guess that powered rhino horn must work.


5 posted on 11/05/2005 9:42:21 AM PST by Blue Screen of Death (/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alexander Rubin

I love my cigar, too, but I take it out of my mouth once in a while.


6 posted on 11/05/2005 9:46:59 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Geez, thats more than Wilt the Stilt Chamberlain


7 posted on 11/05/2005 9:47:13 AM PST by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

George Foreman would have named them all- "George."


8 posted on 11/05/2005 9:57:20 AM PST by emiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Damn, I know what his hobby was...


9 posted on 11/05/2005 10:00:53 AM PST by CommandoFrank (Peer into the depths of hell and there you will find the face of Islam...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
I don't know if I agree with the math. If China's population was 100 then and is 1.3 billion now, it doesn't necessarily work out to each Chinese man of that era having 20 descendants today. Maybe they meant 20 descendants with the same Y-chromosome.

If there were 50 million Chinese males then, some would have died without offspring, or had children but eventually their descendants died out. Say there are 650 million Chinese males today (it may be a little higher because of the one-child rule leading to a surplus of males). Each Chinese male has a Y-chromosome which was carried by an ancestor alive in 1644 (the start of the Ch'ing dynasty), and in nearly all cases that ancestor was Chinese. On average, a Chinese male of 1644 would have 13 descendants today carrying that Y-chromosome, but in fact many would have no such descendants because of families having only daughters, and others would have many more than 13.

Total descendants, including those through female descendants, would on the average be much higher. There are Americans of the 18th century who have thousands of living descendants. It is quite credible that a ruling dynasty would have vastly more descendants because of the imperial harems.

10 posted on 11/05/2005 10:43:38 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

"Once upon a time there were 2 Chinese...now look at how many there are."

11 posted on 11/05/2005 11:42:56 AM PST by JRios1968 ("Cogito, ergo FReep": I think, therefore I FReep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson