Posted on 11/04/2005 1:13:37 AM PST by flattorney
The judicial carousel in U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay's conspiracy case almost spun out of control Thursday as the search for a judge beyond the hint of any political taint reached the chief justice of the Texas Supreme Court. Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson, a Republican, named Pat Priest, a retired Democratic judge from his hometown of San Antonio, to hear the case — but not before Jefferson's own multiple ties to DeLay's political operation were questioned.
Jefferson waved off questions about those ties Thursday afternoon as he searched for a judge to hear the biggest political trial in Texas for this generation. He tapped Priest just minutes before prosecutors filed a motion questioning the perception that Jefferson has too many ties to DeLay's committee and co-defendants to be impartial. Jefferson shared the same campaign treasurer and a consultant as DeLay's Texans for a Republican Majority. One of his largest campaign donations — $25,000 — was from the arm of the Republican National Committee that is at the center of the allegation that DeLay and his co-defendants laundered corporate money into political donations in 2002.
The justice also traveled in 2002 on a campaign swing with one DeLay co-defendant, John Colyandro, on a plane provided by a law partner of a lawyer representing another DeLay co-defendant, Jim Ellis. He also attended a Houston fundraiser with the chairman of the Republican National Committee at the house of a board member of Texans for a Republican Majority. Finally, DeLay's political action committee endorsed Jefferson.
"So what?" said DeLay's lawyer Dick DeGuerin. "Is (Travis County District Attorney) Ronnie Earle saying he (Jefferson) appointed the wrong judge? It's a done deal. It's over." Earle, who is prosecuting DeLay, did not comment Thursday night beyond his written legal motions. But the prosecutor's only recourse might be to challenge Priest if there is a reason to question his impartiality. A search of state and federal databases late Thursday showed Priest gave $150 each to three Democratic state representatives from San Antonio in 2004.
Choice is telling - - For three days, Earle and DeGuerin had been playing a kind of judicial roulette that exposed the challenges of trying a highly political case in a state where all judges run in political elections and have close ties to other candidates. First, DeGuerin won a hearing Tuesday to get state District Judge Bob Perkins, an Austin Democrat, removed from the case because he gave money to Democratic candidates and causes, particularly the Internet-based organization MoveOn.org. Taking a page from that playbook, Earle on Thursday filed a motion that forced regional presiding Judge B.B. Schraub, a Seguin Republican who was supposed to name Perkins' replacement, to withdraw because of his political donations to Republicans.
Schraub asked Jefferson to name a trial judge for the former U.S. House majority leader. Quickly the ties between Jefferson and Texans for a Republican Majority surfaced.
Texans for Public Justice, (Dems-Soros~Shadow Party-Earle Front Operation - TAB) a group tracking campaign donations, disclosed that public campaign records show that Jefferson has paid Austin consultant Susan Lilly $115,779 since 2001. He also had Bill Ceverha, the treasurer for DeLay's Texans for a Republican Majority, as his campaign treasurer. A judge already has ruled in a separate civil lawsuit that Ceverha broke state law by not reporting the corporate donations that DeLay's committee spent during the 2002 elections.
"Where does it stop?" DeGuerin said when first told the news. Yet he insisted Jefferson could appoint a fair judge despite the apparent conflicts — and, by law, he is the last one who can. "This is just an administrative task, not a judicial one," DeGuerin said. "Like it not, Ronnie (Earle) is stuck with it." Jefferson declined to comment to reporters about the appearance of conflicts Thursday afternoon as he raced to find a trial judge. At the same time, Earle's staff was racing to challenge Jefferson's impartiality. Jefferson apparently won the race.
At first blush, University of Texas law professor Steve Bickerstaff said, "I think it would be a mistake if the chief justice didn't recuse himself." Yet Bickerstaff said Jefferson's role ultimately will be judged by the quality of the trial judge he named. "If the chief justice picks someone who's perceived as having partiality, it would subject himself and the whole process to questions about its integrity," Bickerstaff said. "If he picks someone both sides agree is the best person, you'd have a good result." DeGuerin endorsed Priest: "By reputation, he's a fair judge."
Judge choice key - - Priest is a former judge for the 187th District Court in San Antonio. He also is a former adjunct professor of law at St. Mary's University School of Law and a founding member of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. In 1994, he lost a race for the 4th Court of Appeals in which his opponent took to the airwaves to criticize Priest as "soft on crime" because he reduced $1 million bail set by other judges for two murder suspects. Priest's prominent cases included a 1984 trial of Genene Jones, a nurse suspected of killing an unknown number of babies by injection. In 1990, Priest ordered a television reporter jailed because he would not turn over his notes that would reveal who helped arrange a telephone interview with an inmate accused in the shooting death of a San Antonio police officer. The reporter was released two weeks later when he surrendered his notes.
The decision over which judge should preside at DeLay's trial could have a bearing on an array of pretrial issues, particularly whether DeLay could get a fair trial in heavily Democratic Travis County. DeLay successfully lobbied to have the county split into three congressional districts in an unsuccessful attempt to defeat U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin.
DeLay, along with the two co-defendants, is accused of conspiring to violate a law barring corporate money being spent on campaigns and laundering $190,000 of corporate money into political donations to Texas candidates during the 2002 elections. Specifically, the indictment accuses DeLay, Colyandro, who lives in Austin, and Ellis, who lives in Washington, D.C., of exchanging $190,000 of corporate money for the same amount in noncorporate money from an arm of the Republican National Committee. The defendants have denied wrongdoing.
Their lawyers have argued that the corporate money ban is vague, that the law doesn't prohibit sending corporate money out of Texas and that the Republican National Committee donations were legally raised in other states. They also claim that Earle's investigation is a political vendetta for DeLay's role in congressional redistricting.
In Thursday's motion, Earle argued that Schraub, the regional presiding judge, should step aside for the same reasons that Perkins was removed from the case. According to Earle's motion, Schraub has given $5,600 — roughly the same amount as Perkins — to Republican candidates, including President Bush, U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, Gov. Rick Perry, state Sen. Jeff Wentworth of San Antonio and state Rep. Ed Kuempel of Seguin.
In court Tuesday, Earle argued that taking the unprecedented step of reassigning judges because of political donations in a state where judges are elected as partisans would be as divisive as "Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds."
On Thursday, DeGuerin said, "Relax, Chicken Little. The sky is not falling."
All Intel Reports; complete master links index of pertinent Tom DeLay criminal indictments-trial & related FR threads; all pre-trial documents and formal letters; other key documents and articles; videos/audios; and much more info, updated 24/7, are being maintained on FlAttorney's FR profile page, for ease of information and discussion research.
Posted for FLA by TAB
wasn't it at the request of the appeals judge, that the chief was chosen? how is that a carousel? 2 judges make a carousel? Carousels must be a lot more boring than I remember.
It will be a travesty if this even goes to trial.
Carousel - The liberal Dems and the Austin AS newspaper are really hog squealing over all this, like anybody cares but losers. - TAB
Money bet is that Earle will drop the charges against DeLay about the time he and his Dems-Shadow Party clan get their arse exposed in this fraud. But Earle will fight hard and stupid to the very last minute. - TAB
It is better that it go to trial, and be dismissed, with prejudice.. ( no right to appeal the decision )
The actions of Earle in this selection of a judge constitute a clear indication that this is a political witchhunt. I hope there is something in this that can get the man disbarred or civilly sued.
I was thinking along the lines of "get all the rope in Texas, find a tall oak tree".
What happens with the motion to dismiss based on prosecutorial misconduct and/or insufficiency?
Will they be argued after the venue is decided, or can they be argued before?
Any insight would be appreciated.
This piece of paper looks like it came from the same typewriter/word processor and copy machine as Bush's National Guard papers. Where's Buckhead and Howlin?
AIM to Honor People in Pajamas [ Congratulations , Buckhead and TankerKC!]
Congratulations!!
Sounds like a plan...is there an application we have to fill out? :>)
Yes there is. Please include beer for the horses with your application. ;-)
Horses drink out of a pail, don't they?
Seems like pale ale would be appropriate.
Pale ale is favored by Palleaminos and Appaleloosas.
BTW, "The Outlaw Josie Wales" mentioned a type of ale...."chock".....you ever hear of it before?
I'm guessing horses like anything out of a western.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.