It's amazing that some feeble minded people are falling hook, line, and sinker for such an obvious load of crap.
No one is falling for it. But I have doubts about the judge. He may decided to do what he imagines is the "correct" thing and let the "controversy" into the schools. Then it will work its way up to the Supreme Court, and we shall see what the new court will do. We had an earlier thread that gave a pretty good analysis of the legal arguments, and how the SC might deal with it:
Dover players prepare for Supreme Court [Penna evolution trial].
They are not falling for it; they are jumping for it like it was the last lifeboat off the Titanic.
"Behe testified that intelligent design doesn't require a supernatural creator, but an intelligent designer: it does not name the designer."
So, Mr. Behe, who do you think the designer might be?
Well, I don't know. It could be a spaghetti monster, I suppose, or it could be an invisible pink flamingo. Our science is not concerned with the identity of the designer (wink, wink, nod, nod)