[DC Bound]

There you go again....trying to redefine science. I think you'll need something better than ID to be successful in this.

1) Did you read Dembski's explanation that I linked to?

2) Do you have any logical responses other than the two I listed: 1) deny that phenomenon exist beyond the ability of science to explain, or 2) admit science needs to grow.

You have yet to offer a reason to support your view.

[ml1954]

deny that phenomenon exist beyond the ability of science to explain,

Duh...there are always phenomenon currently beyond the ability of science to explain. That's what scientists do for a living. They try to find explanations.

admit science needs to grow.

Duh...science is always trying to expand scientific knowledge (=growing) by exploring the unknown and seeking explanations.

Also, I don't think game analogies are valid, I don't expect to convince you of my view (and all that implies), and I need sleep.