Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlc9852
How do you suppose he came to the conclusion it was 20 million years old?

Most likely carbon dating coupled with at what level in the strata the amber was discovered.

10 posted on 09/30/2005 9:22:09 AM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Prime Choice

I was under the impression carbon dating isn't reliable past 50,000 years or so.


19 posted on 09/30/2005 9:25:11 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Prime Choice

As I understand it, C-14 half life is about 5,700 yrs. It seems that that would make it impossible to date something over 11,400 yrs old using this method.

I've no reason to doubt that it is 20 mil years old, give or take, but I'm not sure how they would have determined that number.


29 posted on 09/30/2005 9:31:21 AM PDT by bigmac0707
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Prime Choice
Most likely carbon dating

Most likely not. Carbon-14 goes back only about 50,000 years.

93 posted on 09/30/2005 10:16:38 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson