Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pending

Here is a Slashdot thread on the post.

http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/28/1943224

Read the comments (warning: the general run of Slashdot commenters tend to be young, left-wing, and not too bright, with limited vocabularies that cause them to repeat the same profanities at length. However, there are many worthwhile technologists on that site).

Among the treasures amongst the generally obtuse comments is a link to the article abstract.

There is one fact omitted from the WND report. While the patient got the umbilical-cell treatment, she (a 37 year old female, paraplegic at 10th thoracic vertebrae x 19 years) also received a laminectomy (having the spinal cavity in the vertebra opened up) at the same time. Historically, a laminectomy has not produced this kind of result.

This blogger seems informed (I got his blog address from the slashdot thread, but this is the exact post on this):

http://www.wesleyjsmith.com/blog/2005/09/umbilical-cord-blood-stem-cells-treat.html

If you read that, you might like Smith's blog. I did and bookmarked him for regular reading. Among other observations in his blog, he notes that when New Jersey made a bucket of money available for stem cell research "since the feds don't fund it," all requests for grants but one were for adult or umbilical cell research -- and the one exception wasn't for a research project, but for a training project.

http://www.wesleyjsmith.com.nyud.net:8090/blog/

Journal abstract of the original article for the techically inclined (same credit, Slashdot; you can download the article from this page, but I don't recommend it to people without a VERY solid biological background at the molecular and cell structure level and up -- there's lots of specialised neurocytology in there):

http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/(hibl2tibmt1yldqlfhsywa55)/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,8,9;journal,1,40;linkingpublicationresults,1:107693,1

I want to believe that this is possible. (I have a friend in similar straits as the woman in the study). I want to believe that this is true. But I recognize that one patient after one treatment is not proof of anything.

Finally, it is important for you all to recognize that this was not a miraculous recovery like Jesus's laying of hands on Lazarus produced. This woman has gotten a shred of motion and a thread of sensation back, which is a miracle, but it's still miles from recovery -- in functional terms, she's still paralysed.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F


12 posted on 09/29/2005 1:51:08 AM PDT by Criminal Number 18F (In my line of work a lot of guys got neurological damage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Criminal Number 18F

Well, I'm sure even that little bit of improvement means a lot to her. Hope is what keeps us going. My father was a quadriplegic for the last 11 years of his life and I think he committed a form of passive suicide by stopping his drug regime that kept his kidneys going. I'd sure like to see some breakthroughs.


13 posted on 09/29/2005 5:58:18 AM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Criminal Number 18F
This woman has gotten a shred of motion and a thread of sensation back, which is a miracle, but it's still miles from recovery -- in functional terms, she's still paralysed.

I would think the difference between NO motion or sensation and a "thread" or a "shred" is huge -- a lot bigger than some motion/sensation vs. more motion/sensation. When you've got some motion, you can build on it; when you've got nothing, you've got, well, nothing.

30 posted on 03/09/2007 2:30:56 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson