Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SuziQ

There was some discussion early on of the "energy bill" containing some relaxation of nuke requirements. I didn't look at the final bill to see whether they came to fruition. I certainly hope so.


64 posted on 08/18/2005 5:14:34 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: AFPhys
We took the kids on a tour of Seabrook nuke plant in 2001 with a homeschool group. Of course we didn't get to go in the dome area itself; they have an 'Education Center' next door. The man doing the presentation mentioned that at the time the plant was built, there were actually TWO plants planned for the site, but because of all the delays for legal stuff and extra costs involved, the utility ditched the second one before it ever went online. The dome was there and everything!

I asked him if, in the present political climate (this was just after 9/11, and I knew the price of oil was gonna go up) if they had any plans to try to open the second one and he said no, it would be outdated by now. Bummer that. We could use some cheaper electricity in this area.

65 posted on 08/18/2005 8:16:38 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson