Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
I would GLADLY accept a pro-abortion SCOTUS Justice as long as they were a strict Constitutionalist on law and order, property rights, gun rights, reverse discrimination, et al.

How pray tell could a strict Constitutionalist not vote to overturn Roe v Wade?

2,065 posted on 07/19/2005 4:06:43 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2048 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07; All

FYI,

What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said
New Book


JB

My new book, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said, has just been published by New York University Press. (You can buy the book here and here). I asked a group of eleven scholars to rewrite the opinions in Roe v. Wade and its companion case, Doe v. Bolton, using only materials available as of January 1973 when the cases were decided. The contributors included Anita Allen ( Penn), Akhil Amar (Yale), Teresa Stanton Collett (St. Thomas), Michael Stokes Paulsen (Minnesota), Jeffrey Rosen (George Washington University), Jed Rubenfeld (Yale), Reva Siegel (Yale), Cass Sunstein (Chicago), Mark Tushnet (Georgetown), and Robin West (Georgetown).

Link: http://balkin.blogspot.com/


2,136 posted on 07/19/2005 4:21:49 PM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2065 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson