Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx

That list isn't very good. That is like Michigan. They don't differentiate between dangerous pedaphiles and those who were caught in a Senior/Freshman romance gone bad. I have a neighbor like that. He isn't dangerous, but there are no levels here in Michigan. They are all lumped together.
I think that is why there is an "uptick" of sex offenses, is because they put everything pertaining to sex on the list. Some offenses are not predatory.


593 posted on 07/02/2005 5:33:01 PM PDT by queenkathy ("Eat a live toad first thing in the morning. Nothing worse can happen to you for the rest of the day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies ]


To: queenkathy

On Fox News today they were saying that this guy was a class 3 sex offender which is very, very bad....but he was free!


598 posted on 07/02/2005 5:38:42 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies ]

To: queenkathy


Right. I am most concerned with the child predators. The statuatory rape pervs are dangerous, but in many cases it's the parents rightfully filing charges. I agree that there is a difference in the offenders and the child rapists are the cretins I want to punish severely on their first conviction.


669 posted on 07/03/2005 12:08:36 AM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson