Posted on 06/23/2005 7:38:21 PM PDT by 68skylark
Note to the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy (or whatever you’re calling yourselves these days): I was just re-elected president of The Newspaper Guild-CWA, and I’m not resigning.
That said, let me address the rest of this column to the people who really matter: the members of The Newspaper Guild.
In case you missed it, for about a month I have been subjected to what I would characterize as a right-wing screed over some comments I made at the National Media Reform Conference in St. Louis on May 13. The comments (which I won’t repeat here) were about journalists getting killed in Iraq and criticized how the U.S. military has dealt with those deaths.
The comments came at the end of a 15-20 minute panel presentation. I emphasized that media reformers should not attack individual journalists and instead should focus on how a concentrated corporate media system is corrupting journalism. I always make this point with media reformers and independent media journalists because, in my experience, calls for media reform sometimes degenerate into deriding individual journalists.
In other words, the essence of my message is: Don’t kill the messenger. I should have said it that way in St. Louis. Instead, I decided to draw a parallel between the assault on journalists for their work and the assault on journalists covering Iraq. I used strong words and said it rather clumsily, but the St. Louis crowd got the point.
If I made a mistake, it was in trying to cover the issues surrounding safety for journalists in Iraq in an off-the-cuff way. I regret that my in-artful phraseology, and the storm it incited on the right, may detract from a critically important issue for journalists, especially those who cover war.
So at the risk of repeating what we’ve reported for months in The Guild Reporter and elsewhere, here’s a better way of saying what I was trying to communicate in St. Louis: An unacceptable number of journalists are being killed in Iraq, most of them by insurgents, many of them brutally. Fourteen of those deaths, involving U.S. forces, have been inadequately explained or investigated by the U.S. military. One, the April 8, 2003, bombing of the Al-Jazeera studios in Baghdad, never has been explained at all. As a result, many journalists around the world wonder if the U.S. military is targeting journalists.
Since April 2003, the Guild, the Committee to Protect Journalists, the International Federation of Journalists, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, Reuters and others repeatedly have called upon the Pentagon to conduct independent investigations of these incidences. So far we have received only redacted, whitewashed explanations which often raise more questions than they answer.
Spanish journalist Jose Couso was killed when the Palestine Hotel, a known headquarters for many unembedded journalists covering the war prior to the occupation, was shelled by a U.S. tank on April 8, 2003. His family and friends still hold a 24-hour vigil at the U.S. embassy in Madrid on the eighth of every month to protest the lack of accountability by our military for Jose’s death. Meeting Jose’s brother a few weeks before the May 13 conference added to my frustration and anger about the U.S. military’s non-responsiveness on this issue.
Nevertheless, the St. Louis conference was about media reform, and the panel I was on focused on concentration of media ownership—and except for those few sentences about journalists dying in Iraq, that’s what I talked about. So you can imagine how surprised I was when Sinclair Broadcasting, one of the largest broadcast owners in the U.S., called to film an interview with me about my comments. (Truthfully, I had to listen to a webcast of my presentation before I actually recalled what I said.)
You’ll remember Sinclair Broadcasting—the broadcaster that on the eve of the 2004 election tried to pass off an anti-John Kerry commercial as a “documentary” about his Vietnam War service. You also may recall that Free Press, the group sponsoring the National Media Reform Conference, led the campaign to protest that broadcast. Ultimately, institutional stockholders—principally some large union pension funds— forced Sinclair to modify its plans. I guess the prospect of piling on the president of a union representing journalists speaking out at a media reform conference sponsored by Free Press was just too tempting.
Sinclair aired its piece without me. I was unavailable. Likewise, I was unavailable to Fox News. (Four different Fox shows called in and/or faxed requests for me to appear.) And to Limbaugh, and several other talk-radio blabbers who peddle hate. And to “Swift Boat Veterans” promoters. And to the Moonies’ Washington Times, and to all those self-righteous bloggers who are so sure they have all the answers.
I gave one interview, to Editor & Publisher, figuring it was a credible publication that reached most Guild members in one way or another. But my cold shoulder didn’t stop the right-wing media machine from blowing its whistle and barreling down the tracks anyway. They had a video webcast clip of my remarks, and they could air them!
Fox’s Bill O’Reilly interviewed Sinclair hack Mark Hyman, who “broke” the story. (Is this really a story?) O’Reilly announced I was hiding and giving no interviews, then proceeded to interview E&P reporter Joe Strupp, whom he identified as the only reporter to interview me. (I was “hiding” from O’Reilly—all of Fox, actually—but not from E&P.) I heard Rush Limbaugh had called me a “babe.”
The Media Reform Conference panel that included me was described as the “left of the left.” The panelist who preceded me was the publisher of a metropolitan newspaper and had to leave the conference early for Washington, D.C., where he attended a meeting of business people who want to permanently repeal the estate tax.
It would all be amusing were it not for the vicious, mean-spirited—sometimes pornographic, sometimes threatening—e-mails and phone messages these hate-stokers from Fox & Co. generated. The misogynistic language and name-calling don’t bother me so much, although if some of these e-mails were read on a network program like the David Letterman Show, Brent Bozell (another social commentator who has called for my resignation) undoubtedly would be clamoring to get the entire CBS network thrown off the air for good for violating obscenity standards.
What does bother me about the e-mails is the number of them that prove the point I was trying to make in St. Louis. Many echoed the sentiments of Charles Edwards who said in an e-mail to me, “We should have open season on journalists in Iraq. Traitors.” If the sentiments expressed in these e-mails are any indication, at least some of these loyal “Americans” think journalists should be targeted by the U.S. military.
That’s why I hope Americans who actually care about democratic discourse and public debate will support independent, fact-based journalism and professional journalists who strive to practice it. Please refrain from attacking reporters who are trying to get to the truth. Focus instead on re-creating a media climate where a future Woodward & Bernstein can investigate abuse and speak truth to power without fear of government retribution or an orchestrated deluge of hate mail calling for their demise.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the White House hasn’t acknowledged an April 8 letter from TNG-CWA, it apparently passed it on to the Pentagon—which got around to mailing a response June 7. Signed by Bryan Whitman, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, it was addressed to Linda Foley and read in its entirety as follows: In response to your April 8, 2005 letter, I want to assure you that the U.S. military examines every journalist death in which our forces were involved. We continue to work with news organizations to do everything realistically possible to reduce the risk on an inherently dangerous battlefield. We share your concerns and thank you for your interest in this important matter.
Some people objected to this view, and I guess this push-back has upset Ms. Foley. I guess this is her attempt to put the matter behind her. I guess this is how the MSM reacts when they're challenged.
Kill the editor instead. (/sarcasm)
This incident seems to have upset the MSM more than any other. It's been independently researched -- the fact are here: Thunder Run: The Armored Strike to Capture Baghdad. But I don't think she likes the conclusions, since the facts don't make U.S. troops look like murderers.
maybe you could summarize the conclusion for those of us who are not going to rush out to buy the book.
The Newspaper Guild is a left-wing labor union. Their sympathies and their integrity are on a par with those of other left-wing labor unions. They are less honest than Dan Rather.
Returning fire. When some scumbags were in the same hotel and firing at our men. Pity some journalists were nearby, but in battle, you don't have time to ask non-combatants to leave the area. You shoot back. She forgets to add that little tidbit.
The left are weenies -- they call names, and can't handle any reply. And they use stupid phrases like "speak truth to power," whatever that means.
The fact that the president of the Newspaper Guild comes forward to attack the rightwing just proves what we already knew: The US media is run by leftwing elitists.
The description they received matched the hotel exactly, and they saw a man with an optical device (later shown to be a camera, not a spotting scope). Given all the circumstances described in the book, I think their actions were reasonable and appropriate.
She's getting a lot of heat
Check this site out:
http://www.radiobs.net/mediaslander/archives/2005/06/a_call_to_actio.php
Linda, you ignorant slut.
If we were targeting journalists they would be about as common as Republican Guard formations (or Imperial Japanese Navy fleets). Instead, your people are all over the place like cockroaches (both in numbers and in their value to society).
So no, we are not targeting journalists. If, for some reason, the National Command Authority were to issue such a targeting order, I would take great pleasure in carrying it out. But unfortunately such an order is unlikely, because President Bush is a good man, and unlike us rough guys in cheap lowest-bidder DCUs, he doesn't have the badness in him to understand that you are the enemy. But you understand, and I understand.
Fourteen, huh? It's a start.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
I follow a blog page for a Korean telecom stock. It was funny that one of the bloggers posted a very partisan politcial viewpoint on an investment board. I politely challenged his post, and he responded with "I have the right to express my viewpoint" and I responded with a polite counterpoint why I disagree and support GWB. His response along with the prior responses kept addressing me as a super patriot, blind to GOP propoganda, a stooge and I should post political viewpoints somewhere else. I politely reminded him that he was the one who started the partisan post on an investment post. He comes back and repeats his diatribe that I am stupid, and thick, and that I do not see the ramifications of GWB hardline on Korea and how it would start a war on the peninsula. I notice that his postings on the board indicated that his sentiments on the Korean stock was a "strong buy". So I ask him how come you recommend buying a South Korean stock on one hand and then politically predict impending war and destruction in the Koreas. He really got pissed off and I was LOL. I did get a website that gives me a good insight on why the left is freaking out. Many leftist feel that the US has become a facist country (http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4113.htm). The website lists 14 characteristics of a facist state and claims the US possesses all the traits of one. Believe it or not many in the active left (and Democrat Party) probably believe in it and it is motivating their political views. I recommend all freepers to read it to get an insight of the opponents' mind and perceptions.
Ok, you can go right ahead and "confront" right wing "hysteria" while we point out that Mz. Foley is merely a bitter, menopausal union thug who forgot to take her Midol today.
Frankly, my dear Ms. Foley, I don't give a damn!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.