Agreed. Also perplexing are those on FR who either advocated lynching him or having someone beat the truth out of him.
Every one of those know-it-alls should have to publicly eat some crow.
I can't stand that.
So true. It was reasonable here to do what the cops did, view him as a person of interst. However, since there were several other logical explanations for her disappearance, which could have even included being taken by a cougar (some of them do live in that area and thay have taken joggers in California), it was wholly improper to conclude he was guilty and suggest he be coerced into confessing. It's only proper to conclude somebody's guilty in a case liike this if ALL other reasonable explanations of the victim's demise can be eliminated, as the jury so effectively and responsibly did in the Scott Peterson case.
Here is one of the other threads...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1393275/posts#comment?q=1
there was some very interesting comments by some ready to use ANYTHING by the fiancee as a clue that he did it....