Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H
It is a fact that he did not abide by it, agreed?

I think the better way to state it would be was the prosecutor even required to abide by it. He clearly acted under another provision of law - but to say he 'did not abide by it' implies some sort of wrong doing.

325 posted on 04/30/2005 3:40:46 AM PDT by ClintonBeGone (Malvone = MMK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]


To: ClintonBeGone
but to say he 'did not abide by it' implies some sort of wrong doing.

Indeed it does. The legislature wrote the law to protect medical privacy. The prosecutor ignored it. The FL legislature has grounds for impeachment and removal from office, IMO.

334 posted on 04/30/2005 12:16:02 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson