[OhioAttorney]

LOL, you just can't help yourself.

Anybody who still takes you seriously can compare your opinion with Kennedy's easily enough:

[W]hat two people do in the privacy of their home isn't any of my business in this Constitutional Republic of ours. --jwalsh07

[A]dults may choose to enter upon [a homosexual] personal relationship in the confines of their own homes and their own private lives and still retain their dignity as free persons. . . . The liberty protected by the Constitution allows homosexual persons the right to make this choice. -- Justice Anthony Kennedy in Lawrence v. Texas

If you think you disagree with the result in Lawrence, then you're either not reading very well or not writing very well. I don't really care which it is (and it may be both); you're clearly not worth any more of my time.

[jwalsh07]

Chuckle, chuckle. You fancy pants lawyers always get snippy when a blue collar guy spanks you in your own specialty.

But I'm done being civil with you. You're simply a liar. My casting a vote to keep my state government out of peoples bedrooms does not equate to the oligarchial federal courts issuing opinions rife with lunacy and abridging powers that rightfully belong to the people through their elected representatives.

Got it Comrade?

[Torie]

You seem to think Mr. Walsh wants the judiciary to legalize sodomy. That would be a false assumption. In fact, I don't want the judiciary to do that either (particularly on the ludicrous and potentially far reaching and robe empowering grounds Kennedy penned while seemingly on some mind altering substance), and as a policy matter, I think I am the only poster on this forum who openly favors legalizing gay marriage as a policy matter.

I hope that helps. Oh yes, Mr. Walsh is one of the smartest folks on this forum, and a fine writer. Cheers.

[GoLightly]

A law that gives with one hand, takes away with the other. Explain to me why any kind of strict scrutiny is justified since Lawrence, considering there were no laws on the book discriminating against homosexuals, sans actions that may have resulted from their nature.