Well, actually I think that the act of homosexuality is a sin but what two people do in the privacy of their home isn't any of my business in this Constitutional Republic of ours.
Do you think it takes initials after one's name to recognize that this is the basis of the Lawrence court's holding?
What law school issues degrees to students who don't understand the meaning of words? Let's take the word "result" this time. What are the results, both immediate and far reaching, of the Lawrence holding Counselor and how could you possibly assert that I would agree with them after our little tete a tete here?