Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Um, this doesn't sound right to me. Maybe Sharon is messing with the mullah's medulla oblongatas?

Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.

1 posted on 04/13/2005 3:25:20 PM PDT by bamaborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bamaborn; SJackson; Alouette
Now on ABC online too. Interesting statement, to say the least. I grow curiouser and curiouser about the Israeli P.M. over the last few years. Perhaps some of our Freepers from that country can give us their thoughts here.
2 posted on 04/13/2005 3:28:37 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamaborn

Hmmmm????????


3 posted on 04/13/2005 3:29:23 PM PDT by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamaborn
Can you spell dizinformatia?
4 posted on 04/13/2005 3:32:31 PM PDT by BullDog108 ("Conservatives believe in God. Liberals think they are God." ---Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamaborn
Whether you like it or not (and I do not like it), Iran will have nuclear weapons. Its not a moot point.

The issue that has to be made clear to the Mullahs and Imans is this: If there is any use of nuclear weapons by Iran or other Muslim entity, Iran will be "glassed".

The basics are simple: Imans and the like do not want to die. They encourage others to do so as they enjoy the power and pleasures of earthly living.

6 posted on 04/13/2005 3:42:50 PM PDT by squirt-gun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamaborn

You remember the drill. First there will be a request for the UN to impose strict sanctions on Iran. Russia and France will opt out, then because diplomatic measures won’t work and Iran will have nuclear technology for energy, there will ba a coalition of the willing sent in.


8 posted on 04/13/2005 3:50:07 PM PDT by Matrix1948
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamaborn
Actually it makes sense for him to say this. Why should Israel have the bear the fallout from a unilateral attack on Iran, if this is the entire world's problem. By making it clear that Israel will not clean up this mess it forces everyone else to do their part.
10 posted on 04/13/2005 3:56:23 PM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bamaborn
If you de-Clintonize Sharon's comments (ie. read between the lines).... he did not see "unilateral action" as an option.
He said Israel did not need to take a leading role
called again for an international coalition

Israel WILL/DOES have allies, and information is coming from other countries that will "lead" to the ultimate goal.

but only months away from overcoming "technical problems" ...."Once they will solve it, that will be the point of no return,"

it doesnt matter how far away a working nuke is, once the skills are there, "It's Miller time" and Israel's coalition will start the party.

11 posted on 04/13/2005 8:24:37 PM PDT by Optimist (I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson