Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Catspaw; kms61
...and refused to transfer the prescription to another pharmacy.

Prescriptions are not pieces of paper but rather an immaterial license issued by a physician to dispense a controlled substance. The prescription in question wasn't a physical script but was called in. It was not as if the pharmacist refused to give a piece of paper back. To "transfer" this prescription would have required the pharmacist to call another pharmacy and effectively re-prescribe it. Since the drug in question is a known abortifacient, this action would have been material participation in a potential abortion. The employer was aware of this moral reservation and the prescription was filled the next Monday by another pharmacist.

The next "emergency order" from this governor could just as easily be to require all surgeons to perform abortions on anyone who asks them.

54 posted on 04/01/2005 5:17:51 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Ronaldus Magnus

The state pharmacy board disciplined him for his actions. He may want to be more careful when choosing his employer to avoid having to be asked to fill birth control prescriptions.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=20614


65 posted on 04/01/2005 5:27:55 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson