Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marsh_of_mists
No, I believe that a pharmacist has a right to not give a drug that kills over 50% of the people exposed to it.

Your sacred all-powerful-government-that-must-be-obeyed argument has no bearing on moral people. And people of deep religious faith should not be banned from certain jobs, as you demand.

39 posted on 04/01/2005 5:08:19 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: FormerACLUmember

What none of you seem to understand is that pharmacists are part of the medical establishment and the medical establishment is already, to a great extent, controlled by the government. Under the current system, this makes the profession of pharmacy in a nebulous position that does not seem to me to be entirely within the private sphere. Now, if you disagree with this system, fight to change it in one way or the other. Advocate deregulation of the medical establishment. Claim that pharmacists should be considered solely private merchants, and not recquire governmentally issued licenses to practice their trade. But the idea that pharmacists should be able to pick and choose which prescriptions they fill out runs entirely against the current system, for better or for worse.


51 posted on 04/01/2005 5:16:32 PM PST by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson