[musical_airman]

I don't know if they would jump for it or not. It would also introduce the concept (maybe) of consequence free drug use- especially if it is affordable. Even if it does cure the addiction to a drug, who's to say it won't create a culture of people who will go on some sort of weird drug binge, then clean up (consequence free) for their own entertainment? Just a thought, though unlikely.

[kevkrom]

It would also introduce the concept (maybe) of consequence free drug use- especially if it is affordable. Even if it does cure the addiction to a drug, who's to say it won't create a culture of people who will go on some sort of weird drug binge, then clean up (consequence free) for their own entertainment?

Not necessarily a bad thing. It could lead to the eventual decriminalization of drugs, which otherwise takes up way too much time, effort, taxpayer money, and Constitutional freedoms.

[ellery]

I don't know if they would jump for it or not. It would also introduce the concept (maybe) of consequence free drug use- especially if it is affordable. Even if it does cure the addiction to a drug, who's to say it won't create a culture of people who will go on some sort of weird drug binge, then clean up (consequence free) for their own entertainment? Just a thought, though unlikely.

You could say the same about a cure for lung cancer. I'm sure some people would take up smoking/smoke more because the consequences would be less. But that wouldn't mean a lung cancer cure was bad.